Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 5;12(7):e0180648.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180648. eCollection 2017.

A casein hydrolysate based formulation attenuates obesity and associated non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and atherosclerosis in LDLr-/-.Leiden mice

Affiliations
Free PMC article

A casein hydrolysate based formulation attenuates obesity and associated non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and atherosclerosis in LDLr-/-.Leiden mice

Marieke H Schoemaker et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Obesity frequently associates with the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and atherosclerosis. Chronic inflammation in white adipose tissue (WAT) seems to be an important driver of these manifestations.

Objective: This study investigated a combination of an extensively hydrolyzed casein (eHC), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), arachidonic acid (ARA), and Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG (LGG) (together referred to as nutritional ingredients, NI) on the development of obesity, metabolic risk factors, WAT inflammation, NAFLD and atherosclerosis in high-fat diet-fed LDLr-/-.Leiden mice, a model that mimics disease development in humans.

Methods: LDLr-/-.Leiden male mice (n = 15/group) received a high-fat diet (HFD, 45 Kcal%) for 21 weeks with or without the NI (23.7% eHC, 0.083% DHA, 0.166% ARA; all w/w and 1x109 CFU LGG gavage 3 times/week). HFD and HFD+NI diets were isocaloric. A low fat diet (LFD, 10 Kcal%) was used for reference. Body weight, food intake and metabolic risk factors were assessed over time. At week 21, tissues were analyzed for WAT inflammation (crown-like structures), NAFLD and atherosclerosis. Effects of the individual NI components were explored in a follow-up experiment (n = 7/group).

Results: When compared to HFD control, treatment with the NI strongly reduced body weight to levels of the LFD group, and significantly lowered (P<0.01) plasma insulin, cholesterol, triglycerides, leptin and serum amyloid A (P<0.01). NI also reduced WAT mass and inflammation. Strikingly, NI treatment significantly reduced macrovesicular steatosis, lobular inflammation and liver collagen (P<0.05), and attenuated atherosclerosis development (P<0.01). Of the individual components, the effects of eHC were most pronounced but could not explain the entire effects of the NI formulation.

Conclusions: A combination of eHC, ARA, DHA and LGG attenuates obesity and associated cardiometabolic diseases (NAFLD, atherosclerosis) in LDLr-/-.Leiden mice. The observed reduction of inflammation in adipose tissue and in the liver provides a rationale for these comprehensive health effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: M.H. Schoemaker and E.A.F. van Tol are employees of Mead Johnson Nutrition. No commercial products were tested in the current study, which was financially supported by MJN. In general, research on these ingredients are subject to patent filings. We hereby confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter our adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Effects of nutritional ingredients on body composition and food intake in LDLr-/-.Leiden mice.
Changes in Body weight over time (A) and average daily food intake (B). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 15. Significant diet effects are shown by *P<0.05 or **P<0.01 compared to HFD. LFD = Low Fat Diet; HFD = High Fat Diet + control gavage; HFD + nutritional ingredients (including eHC, ARA, DHA, and gavage with LGG).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Effects of nutritional ingredients on cardiovascular risk factors in LDLr-/-.Leiden mice.
Plasma levels at 21 weeks of dietary intervention for cholesterol (A), triglycerides (B), glucose (C), insulin (D). Values are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 15. Significant diet effects are shown by *P<0.05 or **P<0.01 compared to HFD. LFD = Low Fat Diet; HFD = High Fat Diet + control gavage; HFD + nutritional ingredients (including eHC, ARA, DHA, and gavage with LGG).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Effects of nutritional ingredients on markers of systemic inflammation and vascular activation in LDLr-/-.Leiden mice.
Plasma levels of SAA (A) and VCAM-1 (B) at 21 weeks of dietary exposure. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 15 Significant diet effects are shown by **P<0.01 or #P = 0.06 compared to HFD. LFD = Low Fat Diet; HFD = High Fat Diet + control gavage; HFD + nutritional ingredients (including eHC, ARA, DHA, and gavage with LGG).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Effects of nutritional ingredients on adipose tissue quantity and quality in LDLr-/-.Leiden mice.
Body composition analysis at 21 weeks of feeding regimes with fat and lean mass (A), with weights of epididymal fat, mesenteric fat and inguinal fat depots (B), representative histology of epidydimal WAT with inflammatory cells forming crown like structures (CLS, black arrows) (C) and quantitative analysis of CLS in different adipose tissue depots (D) (C). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 15. Significant diet effects are shown by **P<0.01 compared to HFD. LFD = Low Fat Diet; HFD = High Fat Diet + control gavage; HFD + nutritional ingredients (including eHC, ARA, DHA, and gavage with LGG).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Liver integrity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in LDLr-/-.Leiden mice.
Liver mass at 21 weeks of feeding regimes (A), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) over time (B), liver macrovascular steatosis (C) and lobular inflammation (D). Representative Sirius Red staining of liver (E) and quantitative biochemical analysis of hepatic total collagen (F) at 21 weeks of dietary interventions. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 15. Significant diet effects are shown by *P<0.05 or **P<0.01. Low Fat Diet; HFD = High Fat Diet + control gavage; HFD + nutritional ingredients (including eHC, ARA, DHA, and gavage with LGG).
Fig 6
Fig 6. Vasculoprotective effects of nutritional ingredients in LDLr-/-.Leiden mice.
Albuminurea at 15 weeks (A) and Atherosclerosis (B) at 21 weeks of dietary interventions. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 15. Significant diet effects are shown by *P<0.05 or **P<0.01 compared to HFD. Low Fat Diet; HFD = High Fat Diet + control gavage; HFD + nutritional ingredients (including eHC, ARA, DHA, and gavage with LGG).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81. Epub 2014/06/02. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yates T, Davies MJ, Khunti K. Obesity and chronic disease in younger people: an unfolding crisis. The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2012;62(594):4–5. Epub 2012/04/24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dietz WH. Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1994;59(5):955–9. Epub 1994/05/01. - PubMed
    1. Astrup A, Brand-Miller J. Diet composition and obesity. Lancet. 2012;379(9821):1100; author reply -1. Epub 2012/03/27. - PubMed
    1. Delzenne NM, Neyrinck AM, Backhed F, Cani PD. Targeting gut microbiota in obesity: effects of prebiotics and probiotics. Nature reviews Endocrinology. 2011;7(11):639–46. Epub 2011/08/10. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.126 - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

This study received unconditional funding support from Mead Johnson Nutrition. MH Schoemaker and EAF van Tol are employees of Mead Johnson Nutrition and contributed to the design of the study and manuscript preparation. Mead Johnson Nutrition employees were not involved in the execution of the study, the consequent data collection and analysis. No other authors declare a conflict of interest. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.