Persantine-Aspirin Reinfarction Study. Part II. Secondary coronary prevention with persantine and aspirin

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Feb;7(2):251-69. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80489-2.


In the Persantine-Aspirin Reinfarction Study, Part II (PARIS II), 3,128 persons who had recovered from myocardial infarction, suffered from 4 weeks to 4 months previously, were randomized into two groups: dipyridamole (Persantine) plus aspirin (n = 1,563) and placebo (n = 1,565). The average length of follow-up was 23.4 months. Prespecified primary end points were coronary incidence (definite nonfatal myocardial infarction plus death due to recent or acute cardiac event), coronary mortality (death due to recent or acute cardiac event) and total mortality, each at 1 year of patient follow-up and at the end of the study. Coronary incidence in the Persantine plus aspirin group was significantly lower than in the placebo group, both at 1 year (30% reduction) and at the end of the study (24% reduction). The statistically significant differences in coronary incidence, at 1 year and at the end of the study, in favor of the combination treatment remained after adjustment for multiple baseline variables and adjustment for multiple testing (three end points for two time periods). Although there were reductions for other end points, these differences were not statistically significant. Coronary mortality was 20% lower in the Persantine plus aspirin group compared with the placebo group at 1 year, and 6% lower overall. Total mortality in the treated group compared with the placebo group was 11% lower at 1 year and 3% lower overall. The reduced rates of coronary incidence largely reflected lower rates of definite nonfatal myocardial infarction in the Persantine plus aspirin group. Several subgroups were defined a priori and at the end of the study. The beneficial effect of Persantine plus aspirin compared with placebo for coronary incidence tended to be greater for the following groups of patients: those who had a non-Q wave infarct; those who were not taking digitalis; those who were receiving beta-receptor blocking drugs at baseline; those who were in New York Heart Association functional class I; those who had had only one myocardial infarction; or those who were enrolled in the study early, that is within 85 days of the qualifying myocardial infarction.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Actuarial Analysis
  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists / therapeutic use
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aspirin / administration & dosage
  • Aspirin / therapeutic use*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Digitalis Glycosides / therapeutic use
  • Dipyridamole / administration & dosage
  • Dipyridamole / therapeutic use*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Combinations
  • Electrocardiography
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / drug therapy
  • Myocardial Infarction / mortality
  • Myocardial Infarction / prevention & control*
  • Patient Compliance
  • Random Allocation
  • Recurrence


  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
  • Digitalis Glycosides
  • Drug Combinations
  • Dipyridamole
  • Aspirin