Feasibility of thermophilic anaerobic processes for treating waste activated sludge under low HRT and intermittent mixing
- PMID: 28689107
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.069
Feasibility of thermophilic anaerobic processes for treating waste activated sludge under low HRT and intermittent mixing
Abstract
Thermophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) arises as an optimized solution for the waste activated sludge (WAS) management. However, there are few feasibility studies using low solids content typically found in the WAS, and that consider uncommon operational conditions such as intermittent mixing and low hydraulic retention time (HRT). In this investigation, a single-stage pilot reactor was used to treat WAS at low HRT (13, 9, 6 and 5 days) and intermittent mixing (withholding mixing 2 h prior feeding). Thermophilic anaerobic digestion (55 °C) was initiated from a mesophilic digester (35 °C) by the one-step startup strategy. Although instabilities on partial alkalinity (1245-3000 mgCaCO3/L), volatile fatty acids (1774-6421 mg/L acetic acid) and biogas production (0.21-0.09 m3/m3reactor.d) were observed, methanogenesis started to recover in 18 days. The thermophilic treatment of WAS at 13 and 9 days HRT efficiently converted VS into biogas (22 and 21%, respectively) and achieved high biogas yield (0.24 and 0.22 m3/kgVSfed, respectively). Intermittent mixing improved the retention of methanogens inside the reactor and reduced the washout effect even at low HRT (<9 days). The negative thermal balance found was influenced by the low solids content in the WAS (2.1% TS) and by the heat losses from the digester walls. The energy balance and economic analyses demonstrated the feasibility of thermophilic AD of WAS in a hypothetical full-scale system, when the heat energy could be recovered from methane in a scenario of higher solids concentration in the substrate (>5% TS).
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Economic assessment; Energy balance; Hydraulic retention time; Intermittent mixing; Waste activated sludge.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
-
Improving biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of Thickened Waste Activated Sludge (TWAS) and fat, oil and grease (FOG) using a dual-stage hyper-thermophilic/thermophilic semi-continuous reactor.J Environ Manage. 2018 Jul 1;217:416-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.123. Epub 2018 Apr 5. J Environ Manage. 2018. PMID: 29627647
-
Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge in an intermittent mixing reactor: Effect of hydraulic retention time and organic loading rate.J Environ Manage. 2023 Jul 15;338:117839. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117839. Epub 2023 Mar 30. J Environ Manage. 2023. PMID: 37003223
-
Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge and fat, oil, and grease.Water Environ Res. 2009 May;81(5):476-85. doi: 10.2175/106143008x357192. Water Environ Res. 2009. PMID: 19472939
-
Impact of mixing intensity and duration on biogas production in an anaerobic digester: a review.Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2020 Jun;40(4):508-521. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2020.1731413. Epub 2020 Mar 30. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2020. PMID: 32228091 Review.
Cited by
-
SARS-CoV-2 in sewer systems and connected facilities.Process Saf Environ Prot. 2020 Nov;143:196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.06.049. Epub 2020 Jul 4. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2020. PMID: 32834559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245023. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31835523 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
