Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul 9;7(3):43.
doi: 10.3390/bs7030043.

Virtual Reality as a Promising Strategy in the Assessment and Treatment of Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Virtual Reality as a Promising Strategy in the Assessment and Treatment of Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder: A Systematic Review

Marcele Regine de Carvalho et al. Behav Sci (Basel). .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Several lines of evidence suggest that Virtual Reality (VR) has a potential utility in eating disorders. The objective of this study is to review the literature on the use of VR in bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED). Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement for reporting systematic reviews, we performed a PubMed, Web of Knowledge and SCOPUS search to identify studies employing VR in the assessment and treatment of BN and BED. The following search terms were used: "virtual reality", "eating disorders", "binge eating", and "bulimia nervosa". From the 420 articles identified, 19 were selected, nine investigated VR in assessment and 10 were treatment studies (one case-report, two non-controlled and six randomized controlled trials). The studies using VR in BN and BED are at an early stage. However, considering the available evidence, the use of VR in the assessment of those conditions showed some promise in identifying: (1) how those patients experienced their body image; and (2) environments or specific kinds of foods that may trigger binge-purging cycle. Some studies using VR-based environments associated to cognitive behavioral techniques showed their potential utility in improving motivation for change, self-esteem, body image disturbances and in reducing binge eating and purging behavior.

Keywords: binge eating disorder; binge–purging eating disorders; bulimia nervosa; systematic review; virtual reality.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Flow Diagram.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 6 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Whiteford H.A., Ferrari A.J., Degenhardt L., Feigin V., Vos T. The Global Burden of Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders: An Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116820. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whiteford H., Degenhardt L., Rehm J., Baxter A., Ferrari A., Erskine H., Charlson F., Norman R., Flaxman A., Johns N., et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382:1575–1586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61611-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smink F., Hoeken D., Hoek H. Epidemiology of Eating Disorders: Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality Rates. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2012;14:406–414. doi: 10.1007/s11920-012-0282-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association Publishing; Arlington, VA, USA: 2013. (DSM-5)
    1. Brooks S., Rask-Andersen M., Benedict C., Schiöth H. A debate on current eating disorder diagnoses in light of neurobiological findings: Is it time for a spectrum model? BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:76 doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-76. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Feedback