Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;44(8):505-509.
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000629.

US Public Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinical Services in an Era of Declining Public Health Funding: 2013-14

Affiliations

US Public Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinical Services in an Era of Declining Public Health Funding: 2013-14

Jami S Leichliter et al. Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Background: We examined the infrastructure for US public sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinical services.

Methods: In 2013 to 2014, we surveyed 331 of 1225 local health departments (LHDs) who either reported providing STD testing/treatment in the 2010 National Profile of Local Health Departments survey or were the 50 local areas with the highest STD cases or rates. The sample was stratified by jurisdiction population size. We examined the primary referral clinics for STDs, the services offered and the impact of budget cuts (limited to government funding only). Data were analyzed using SAS, and analyses were weighted for nonresponse.

Results: Twenty-two percent of LHDs cited a specialty STD clinic as their primary referral for STD services; this increased to 53.5% of LHDs when combination STD-family planning clinics were included. The majority of LHDs (62.8%) referred to clinics providing same-day services. Sexually transmitted disease clinics more frequently offered extragenital testing for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea (74.7%) and gonorrhea culture (68.5%) than other clinics (52.9%, 46.2%, respectively; P < 0.05). The majority of LHDs (61.5%) reported recent budget cuts. Of those with decreased budgets, the most common impacts were fewer clinic hours (42.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.4-61.2), reduced routine screening (40.2%; 95% CI, 21.7-58.8) and reductions in partner services (42.1%; 95% CI, 23.6-60.7). One quarter of those with reduced STD budgets increased fees or copays for clients.

Conclusions: Findings demonstrate gaps and reductions in US public STD services including clinical services that play an important role in reducing disease transmission. Furthermore, STD clinics tended to offer more specialized STD services than other public clinics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest to report.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams D, Fullerton K, Jajosky R, et al. Summary of notifiable infectious diseases and conditions – United States, 2013. MMWR. 2015;62(53):1–119. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2014. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2015.
    1. Sexton J, Garnett G, Rottingen J. Metaanalysis and Metaregression in Interpreting Study Variability in the Impact of Sexually Transmitted Diseases on Susceptibility to HIV Infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:351–357. - PubMed
    1. Celum CL, Bolan G, Krone M, et al. Patients attending STD clinics in an evolving health care environment. Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24:599–605. - PubMed
    1. Cramer R, Leichliter JS, Gift TL. Are safety net sexually transmitted disease clinical and preventive services still needed in a changing health care system? Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:628–630. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types