Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 17;7(1):5579.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05982-x.

Individual recognition of opposite sex vocalizations in the zebra finch

Affiliations

Individual recognition of opposite sex vocalizations in the zebra finch

Pietro B D'Amelio et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Individual vocal recognition plays an important role in the social lives of many vocally active species. In group-living songbirds the most common vocalizations during communal interactions are low-intensity, soft, unlearned calls. Being able to tell individuals apart solely from a short call would allow a sender to choose a specific group member to address, resulting in the possibility to form complex communication networks. However, little research has yet been carried out to discover whether soft calls contain individual identity. In this study, males and females of zebra finch pairs were tested with six vocalization types - four different soft calls, the distance call and the male song - to investigate whether they are able to distinguish individuals of the opposite sex. For both sexes, we provide the first evidence of individual vocal recognition for a zebra finch soft unlearned call. Moreover, while controlling for habituation and testing for repeatability of the findings, we quantify the effects of hitherto little studied variables such as partners' vocal exchange previous to the experiment, spectral content of playback calls and quality of the answers. We suggest that zebra finches can recognize individuals via soft vocalizations, therefore allowing complex directed communication within vocalizing flocks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Latency during playback. Latency to the first answering call for different playback series (analysed time interval: 0–1.5 s after the onset of the playback stimulus). Colours represent the type of playback call broadcast; dots indicate individual calls (raw data). Familiarity categories: m = mate of the focal bird; f = familiar individual; uf = unfamiliar individual. For males (a) and females (b) in both trials the computed 95% credible intervals (error bars) as well as the fitted value (black symbols) are shown. Significant differences between mate and the other familiarity categories are marked by black asterisks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of calls during playback. Number of answering calls that focal individuals emitted during the different playback series. Raw data for males (a) and females (a) and both trials (symbols indicate responses of individual birds) and the computed 95% credible intervals (error bars) as well as the fitted value (black symbols) are shown. Colours represent the type of playback call broadcast. Familiarity categories are indicated by letters: m = mate of the focal bird; f = familiar individual; uf = unfamiliar individual. Significant differences between mate and the other familiarity categories are marked by black asterisks.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bee MA, Micheyl C. The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2008;122:235–251. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.3.235. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Insley SJ, Phillips AV, Charrier I. A review of social recognition in pinnipeds. Aquatic Mammals. 2003;29:181–201. doi: 10.1578/016754203101024149. - DOI
    1. Deecke VB. Studying marine mammal cognition in the wild: a review of four decades of playback experiments. Aquatic Mammals. 2006;32:461–482. doi: 10.1578/AM.32.4.2006.461. - DOI
    1. Frommolt K-H, Goltsman ME, Macdonald DW. Barking foxes, Alopex lagopus: field experiments in individual recognition in a territorial mammal. Animal Behaviour. 2003;65:509–518. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2064. - DOI
    1. Lambrechts, M. M. & Dhondt, A. A. In Current Ornithology 115–139 (Springer US, 1995).

Publication types