Heart rate variability is enhanced by long-lasting pleasant touch at CT-optimized velocity
- PMID: 28723347
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.007
Heart rate variability is enhanced by long-lasting pleasant touch at CT-optimized velocity
Abstract
Introduction: The present study explores whether long-lasting pleasant touch has positive effects on the stress response, reward sensitivity, mood, and interoceptive awareness.
Methods: 40 participants received either 35min of brush stroking targeting C-tactile fibres (CT) or vibration on the forearm, and rated pleasantness and intensity. Prior and after, stress response (cortisol and heart rate variability), reward sensitivity, mood and interoceptive awareness were measured.
Results: Pleasantness decreased over time for both groups, with brush stroking being perceived as more pleasant and intense than vibration. Heart rate variability (SDNN) increased for brush stroking only, and was related to the higher pleasantness and intensity. No significant effect of CT-optimal touch was observed on any of the other measures.
Discussion: The beneficial effect of pleasant touch on heart rate variability suggests a neuronal link between CT-fibre stimulation and autonomic regulation, and highlights the potential of long-lasting touch to improve the physiological response.
Keywords: CT-optimal touch; Heart rate variability; Pleasant touch; SDNN; Salivary cortisol; Stress response.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Touch satiety: differential effects of stroking velocity on liking and wanting touch over repetitions.PLoS One. 2014 Nov 18;9(11):e113425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113425. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25405620 Free PMC article.
-
C-tactile afferent stimulating touch carries a positive affective value.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173457. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28282451 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Touch between romantic partners: Being stroked is more pleasant than stroking and decelerates heart rate.Physiol Behav. 2017 Aug 1;177:169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 3. Physiol Behav. 2017. PMID: 28478031
-
Affective touch: A meta-analysis on sex differences.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.037. Epub 2019 Oct 12. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020. PMID: 31614152 Review.
-
The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Feb;34(2):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Oct 8. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010. PMID: 18952123 Review.
Cited by
-
Dynamic touch reduces physiological arousal in preterm infants: A role for c-tactile afferents?Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Oct;39:100703. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100703. Epub 2019 Aug 21. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31487608 Free PMC article.
-
Caressed by music: Related preferences for velocity of touch and tempo of music?Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1135988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135988. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36935986 Free PMC article.
-
Interaction Matters: The Effect of Touching the Social Robot PARO on Pain and Stress is Stronger When Turned ON vs. OFF.Front Robot AI. 2022 Jul 8;9:926185. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.926185. eCollection 2022. Front Robot AI. 2022. PMID: 35875704 Free PMC article.
-
Neuroinflammation, body temperature and behavioural changes in CD1 male mice undergoing acute restraint stress: An exploratory study.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0259938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259938. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34780550 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity to CT-optimal, Affective Touch Depends on Adult Attachment Style.Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 28;8(1):14544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32865-6. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30266979 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
