Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 24;8(1):116.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00160-z.

An optogenetic toolbox for unbiased discovery of functionally connected cells in neural circuits

Affiliations

An optogenetic toolbox for unbiased discovery of functionally connected cells in neural circuits

Dominique Förster et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Optical imaging approaches have revolutionized our ability to monitor neural network dynamics, but by themselves are unable to link a neuron's activity to its functional connectivity. We present a versatile genetic toolbox, termed 'Optobow', for all-optical discovery of excitatory connections in vivo. By combining the Gal4-UAS system with Cre/lox recombination, we target the optogenetic actuator ChrimsonR and the sensor GCaMP6 to stochastically labeled, nonoverlapping and sparse subsets of neurons. Photostimulation of single cells using two-photon computer-generated holography evokes calcium responses in downstream neurons. Morphological reconstruction of neurite arbors, response latencies and localization of presynaptic markers suggest that some neuron pairs recorded here are directly connected, while others are two or more synapses apart from each other. With this toolbox, we discover wiring principles between specific cell types in the larval zebrafish tectum. Optobow should be useful for identification and manipulation of networks of interconnected neurons, even in dense neural tissues.Mechanisms of neural processing can only be understood by revealing patterns of connectivity among the cellular components of the circuit. Here the authors report a new genetic toolbox, 'Optobow', which enables simultaneous optogenetic activation of single neurons in zebrafish and measuring the activity of downstream neurons in the network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Optobow allows all-optical mapping of connected neurons. a Design of the Optobow-c construct. mCerulean and tdTomato are both membrane-targeted (CAAX motif). b Sketch for Optobow-c expression in the zebrafish optic tectum. Different cell types are indicated by their arborization patterns in the tectal neuropil. Addition of Cre by transient injections results in random expression of either ChrimsonR (labeled by tdTomato, magenta) or GCaMP6f (green). Unrecombined cells are labeled by mCerulean (blue). Upon photostimulation of a single ChrimsonR cell (dashed orange outline) connected cells will be highlighted by a rise in GCaMP fluorescence (dark green cell). c In vivo tectal expression of Optobow-c. Scale bar, 20 µm. d Microscope setup for all-optical connectivity mapping. Two independent infrared-pulsed lasers are used to photostimulate ChrimsonR cells (magenta) and to image GCaMP fluorescence (green), respectively. A spatial light modulator (SLM) allows precisely targeted stimulation of single cells. See methods for abbreviations. e Dorsal view of tectal Optobow-c expression. Single fluorescent channels show a cluster of three ChrimsonR- (left) and 18 GCaMP6f-expressing cells (middle). Photostimulation was either confined to a single ChrimsonR cell (Stim1, dashed orange outline) or to a control region of equal size (Stim2). White dashed line marks skin. Dotted rectangles show regions of calcium imaging during photostimulation. A close-up showing a single confocal plane (z = 2.5 µm) of the photostimulated region (Stim1) is shown in the merge on the right. Despite the close proximity of the ChrimsonR and the GCaMP cell#2, exclusive expression of either component allows restricted stimulation of the ChrimsonR-expressing cell. Scale bar, 15 µm. f Calcium transients acquired at 10 fps shown as Z-scores, obtained simultaneously from the regions indicated in e. Photostimulation events are highlighted by dashed lines with stimulation lengths indicated below. Off-target stimulation did not result in significant GCaMP activity (Stim2)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Simultaneous connectivity mapping and morphological analysis with Optobow-n. a Schematic of the Optobow-n construct. b Tectal-specific expression of Optobow-n. A single ChrimsonR-expressing cell (magenta) is surrounded by seven nls-GCaMP6f-expressing cells, membrane-labeled by mCitrine (yellow). Localization of GCaMP6f (cyan) appears completely restricted to the nucleus. White dashed line indicates skin. Orange dashed line in two-channel merge (right image) marks photostimulated region. Dotted rectangles show regions of calcium imaging during photostimulation. Arrowheads show mCerulean signals in non-recombined cells. Scale bar, 20 µm. c Calcium transients (Z-scores) acquired at 10 fps from the regions annotated in b. Photostimulation events of 200 ms are marked by dashed lines. While calcium activity of cell#1 is tightly coupled to the photostimulation, activity of cell#2 appears slightly delayed. No significant calcium responses were detectable in other neighbouring cells (#3–5). d Three-dimensional tracings of the photostimulated cell (magenta) and the two responding cells. Dorsal view is shown on the left and transverse view on the right. The stimulated cell is a bistratified projection neuron with a descending axon (arrowhead). Cell#1 is a bistratified periventricular interneuron and cell#2 is a non-stratified projection neuron, which sends an axon to the intertectal commissure (arrows). Scale bar, 20 µm
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PA-GFP reveals morphologies of functionally connected cells. a In Optobow-nPA, all ‘nls-GCaMP6s’ cells co-express PA-GFP. b Optobow-nPA expression in the optic tectum. A single ChrimsonR-expressing cell (magenta) was photostimulated (orange dashed line) and GCaMP fluorescence was monitored in six neighbouring cells by line scans across the nuclei. Note that PA-GFP is not detectable before its activation. Scale bar, 20 µm. c Calcium measurements acquired at 250 fps for the GCaMP cells annotated in b. Raw (grey) and averaged ∆F/F responses (red) are shown on the left, heat maps for Z-scores are on the right. Photostimulation epochs of 200 ms are indicated by dashed lines. Cell#1 and #5 showed reliable calcium responses upon photostimulation. d Close-up of cell#1 after photoactivation of PA-GFP. A less saturated, single slice of the cell body region shown in the lower left demonstrates exclusive photoactivation of cell#1. Scale bar, 20 µm. e, f Three-dimensional filament reconstruction of the presynaptic cell (magenta) and cell#1 (green) in dorsal view (e) and transverse view (f). The presynaptic cell is a bistratified projection neuron, and cell#1 is a non-stratified projection neuron. Descending projection axons are marked (arrows). Scale bar, 20 µm
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Optobow-nPA_Syp reveals potential synaptic contacts. a In Optobow-nPA_Syp, ChrimsonR-expressing cells are co-labeled by Synaptophysin-mCitrine. b Tectal-specific expression of Optobow-nPA_Syp. Cell bodies of two ChrimsonR-expressing cells (magenta, close-up in lower right, Stim1) or neuropil regions (Stim2), respectively, were stimulated (orange dashed line), and activity of two nls-GCaMP6s-expressing cells (arrowheads) was monitored. Note that a radial glia cell overexpressing ChrimsonR-tagRFP and Syp-mCitrine appears in white. c Z-scores of calcium measurements for cell#1 and cell#2 during cell body (Stim1) or neuropil stimulations (Stim2). Photostimulation epochs of 200 ms are indicated by dashed lines. Cell#1 shows high response reliability. While cell#2 shows spontaneous activity during Stim1, its response correlates to neuropil stimulations suggesting that additional ChrimsonR-labeled cells were activated by Stim2. d Photoactivation of PA-GFP in cell#1 (arrow). Spectral unmixing was used to separate PA-GFP/GCaMP (green) from mCitrine signals (yellow; see Methods section). Scale bar, 20 µm. e Close-up on single confocal slices of the regions marked in d before and after PA-GFP photoactivation. Scale bar, 10 µm. f Three-dimensional filament reconstruction of presynaptic (magenta) and connected cells (green) in transverse view. Potential synapses, shown in yellow (arrows), are restricted to a single tectal layer. Scale bar, 20 µm
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Quantification of response latencies and reliabilities. All data are derived from 5 dpf larvae expressing Optobow-nPA, using a sampling rate for calcium signals of <4.5 ms per frame. a Distribution of all response latencies. Events are grouped in temporal bins of 50 ms. Orange shaded region marks 200 ms of ChrimsonR photostimulation. Number of trials n = 65, number of cells = 12. b Individual cell response reliability vs. response onset latency. For every cell, the average response onset is represented along the X axis, while the ratio responses per trials is plotted in the Y axis. Dashed line represents a linear regression model of the data to evaluate the degree of correlation (coefficient of determination is 0.13329). Morphological analysis shown below indicates overlapping (a–c) or non-overlapping (d–f) neurite arbors of the functionally identified cell pairs. Error bars are SD. Scale bar, 20 µm. c Average response latencies of three non-overlapping cells (red data points in b) compared to all other identified responding cells. Error bars are SD
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Optobow analysis can be expanded to study long-range connectivity of different cell types. a Sketch simplifying the connection of an RGC axon with a PVN in the optic tectum. b Live expression of Optobow-nPA. A single RGC axon (magenta) and five PVN nuclei are labeled (green, left). White dashed lines mark the skin. Upon identification of the connected cell#2, PA-GFP was photoactivated (right). Scale bar, 20 µm. c Calcium traces (Z-scores) for the cells annotated in b. Photostimulation epochs of 200 ms are indicated by dashed lines. Only cell#2 showed responses upon photostimulation. d Filament reconstructions in dorsal view (left) and transverse view (right). The RGC axon terminates in the stratum fibrosum et griseum superficiale (SFGS) layer 1 (18–20 µm distance from skin), where it contacts the dendrites of the bistratified PVIN (cell#2). Scale bar, 20 µm. e Immunostainings against HuC/D (green) and tdTomato (magenta) reveal the dendritic pattern of the activated RGC in the retina. A filament reconstruction is shown on the right. Its monostratified dendrites exclusively target the OFF layer of the IPL. Scale bar, 20 µm. GCL, ganglion cell layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; PVIN, periventricular interneuron
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Optobow reveals novel excitatory connections of projection neurons within the optic tectum. a, b Morphological reconstructions of connected tectal cells, identified using Optobow-nPA, in dorsal view (a) and transverse view (b). Cell types are indicated on the left. White dashed lines mark the skin. Arrows point to projection axons leaving the neuropil. Values for response onset time (s) and response reliability (r) are shown in b. Scale bar, 15 µm. c Model for tectal connectivity of PVPNs. In addition to an axon leaving the tectum, PVPNs make functional, excitatory connections both with PVINs and other PVPNs. bs, bistratified; ms, monostratified; ns, non-stratified; PVIN, periventricular interneuron; PVPN, periventricular projection neuron; ts, tristratified
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Registration of Optobow fish highlights relative anatomical positions of connected cell pairs. ad Registration of six identified cell pairs (illustrated by the same cell body color) into one reference brain (outlined by DAPI). Shown are dorsal (a), lateral (b and c) and frontal views (d). Optic tecta are outlined by white, and eyes by yellow dashed lines, respectively. The RGC-PVIN cell pair (white cell bodies) described in Fig. 6 was added in bd. Scale bar, 50 µm. e, f Dorsal (e) and transverse views (f) of single cell pairs shown in ad. White dashed lines outline skin. Identified cell types are indicated below. Scale bar, 20 µm

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dumitriu D, Cossart R, Huang J, Yuste R. Correlation between axonal morphologies and synaptic input kinetics of interneurons from mouse visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 2007;17:81–91. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj126. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kasthuri N, et al. Saturated reconstruction of a volume of neocortex. Cell. 2015;162:648–661. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.054. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ohki K, Chung S, Ch’ng YH, Kara P, Reid RC. Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature. 2005;433:597–603. doi: 10.1038/nature03274. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ji N, Freeman J, Smith SL. Technologies for imaging neural activity in large volumes. Nat. Neurosci. 2016;19:1154–1164. doi: 10.1038/nn.4358. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alivisatos AP, et al. Nanotools for neuroscience and brain activity mapping. ACS Nano. 2013;7:1850–1866. doi: 10.1021/nn4012847. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources