Validation of functional calibration and strap-down joint drift correction for computing 3D joint angles of knee, hip, and trunk in alpine skiing

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0181446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181446. eCollection 2017.


To obtain valid 3D joint angles with inertial sensors careful sensor-to-segment calibration (i.e. functional or anatomical calibration) is required and measured angular velocity at each sensor needs to be integrated to obtain segment and joint orientation (i.e. joint angles). Existing functional and anatomical calibration procedures were optimized for gait analysis and calibration movements were impractical to perform in outdoor settings. Thus, the aims of this study were 1) to propose and validate a set of calibration movements that were optimized for alpine skiing and could be performed outdoors and 2) to validate the 3D joint angles of the knee, hip, and trunk during alpine skiing. The proposed functional calibration movements consisted of squats, trunk rotations, hip ad/abductions, and upright standing. The joint drift correction previously proposed for alpine ski racing was improved by adding a second step to reduce separately azimuth drift. The system was validated indoors on a skiing carpet at the maximum belt speed of 21 km/h and for measurement durations of 120 seconds. Calibration repeatability was on average <2.7° (i.e. 3D joint angles changed on average <2.7° for two repeated sets of calibration movements) and all movements could be executed wearing ski-boots. Joint angle precision was <4.9° for all angles and accuracy ranged from -10.7° to 4.2° where the presence of an athlete-specific bias was observed especially for the flexion angle. The improved joint drift correction reduced azimuth drift from over 25° to less than 5°. In conclusion, the system was valid for measuring 3D joint angles during alpine skiing and could be used outdoors. Errors were similar to the values reported in other studies for gait. The system may be well suited for within-athlete analysis but care should be taken for between-athlete analysis because of a possible athlete-specific joint angle bias.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Calibration
  • Gait / physiology
  • Hip Joint / anatomy & histology
  • Hip Joint / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods
  • Knee Joint / anatomy & histology
  • Knee Joint / physiology*
  • Male
  • Monitoring, Ambulatory / methods
  • Movement / physiology
  • Posture / physiology*
  • Range of Motion, Articular / physiology
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Skiing / physiology*
  • Torso / physiology*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The study was funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Sport (FOSPO), grant 15-01; VM10052 and was partly supported by “Fondation de soutien à la recherche dans le domaine de l’orthopédie et traumatologie”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.