Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 4;214(9):2507-2521.
doi: 10.1084/jem.20170051. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

ILC2s regulate adaptive Th2 cell functions via PD-L1 checkpoint control

Affiliations

ILC2s regulate adaptive Th2 cell functions via PD-L1 checkpoint control

Christian Schwartz et al. J Exp Med. .

Abstract

Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) are important effector cells driving the initiation of type 2 immune responses leading to adaptive T helper 2 (Th2) immunity. Here we show that ILC2s dynamically express the checkpoint inhibitor molecule PD-L1 during type 2 pulmonary responses. Surprisingly, PD-L1:PD-1 interaction between ILC2s and CD4+ T cells did not inhibit the T cell response, but PD-L1-expressing ILC2s stimulated increased expression of GATA3 and production of IL-13 by Th2 cells both in vitro and in vivo. Conditional deletion of PD-L1 on ILC2s impaired early Th2 polarization and cytokine production, leading to delayed worm expulsion during infection with the gastrointestinal helminth Nippostrongylus brasiliensis Our results identify a novel PD-L1-controlled mechanism for type 2 polarization, with ILC2s mediating an innate checkpoint to control adaptive T helper responses, which has important implications for the treatment of type 2 inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PD-L1 is expressed on ILC2s and is involved in the immune response against N. brasiliensis. (a) Lung linCD45+CD90+ST2+KLRG1+ ILC2 (for gating strategy, see Fig. S1) were analyzed for surface expression of MHC II and costimulatory molecules before (blue line) and 5 d after infection with N. brasiliensis (Nb, red line) and compared with fluorescence minus one (FMO; tinted gray). (b) Dot plots show expression of PD-L1–expressing lung ILC2s in WT C57BL/6 before and after infection with N. brasiliensis in comparison with FMO control and PD-L1−/− control. (c) Graphs depict PD-L1 expression on lung ILC2s and PD-1–expressing lung CD4+ T cells on indicated days after N. brasiliensis infection in individual C57BL/6 (closed circles) and PD-L1−/− (open circles) mice. Mean ± SEM from three experiments is depicted. (d) Bar graph shows fold up-regulation of the mean fluorescence intensity of PD-L1 on lung ILC2s and DCs from N. brasiliensis–infected mice in relation to untreated controls. Bar graph shows the mean + SEM of four mice per group from two experiments. (e) Intestinal worm burden in C57BL/6 (black bar) and PD-L1−/− (open bar) mice 7 d after N. brasiliensis infection. Bar graphs show the mean + SEM of nine mice per group from three independent experiments. (f) Frequency of IL-4–, IL-5–, and IL-13–expressing ILC2s in the lung and mesenteric lymph nodes of naive (blue) and Nb-infected (red, day 5) WT (left) and PD-L1−/− (right) mice. Bar graphs show the mean + SEM from six mice per group from two experiments. (g) Periodic acid–Schiff staining of fixed small intestinal tissue 5 d after N. brasiliensis infection. Bar graph shows the mean + SD of four mice, with 5 crypt-villus units counted per mouse. Bars, 1 mm. (h) PD-L1 expression on lung ILC2s in naive and day 5 N. brasiliensis–infected Rag1−/− and PD-L1−/−/Rag1−/− mice. Bar graphs show the mean + SEM from four to six mice per group from two experiments. (i) PD-L1 expression on lung ILC2s in naive and day 5 N. brasiliensis–infected C57BL/6, MHC2−/−, and PD-L1−/− mice. Bar graphs show the mean + SD from three mice per group. (j) Small intestines from C57BL/6 mice were digested before and 5 d after infection with N. brasiliensis. ILC1s, ILC2s, and ILC3s were analyzed for PD-L1 expression. Bar graphs show the mean + SD from three individual mice per group. Student’s t test was used to analyze data, and p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. *, P < 0.05; ns, not significant.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PD-L1 is up-regulated on IL-33–activated ILC2s in vitro and in vivo. (a) ILC2s were sort-purified from lungs of C57BL/6 mice and cultured in cRPMI in the presence of indicated cytokines (10 ng/ml each) for 5 d. Bar graphs show the mean + SEM of five replicates per group from two independent experiments. Histogram overlay shows representative PD-L1 expression on ILC2s. (b) C57BL/6 mice were injected i.p. with PBS, IL-25 (500 µg/dose), or IL-33 (500 µg/dose) on three consecutive days, and lung ILC2s were analyzed for PD-L1 expression the next day. Bars show the mean + SD from three mice per group from one of two independent experiments. Histogram overlay shows representative PD-L1 expression on ILC2s. (c) WT, Il17br−/−, and Il1rl1−/− mice were infected with N. brasiliensis and analyzed for PD-L1–expressing lung ILC2s 5 d later. Bars show the mean + SEM from 5–10 mice per group from two independent experiments. Histogram overlay shows representative PD-L1 expression on ILC2s. (d) Rag1−/− mice were injected with IL-2:anti–IL-2 complexes three times every other day, and lung ILC2s were analyzed for PD-L1 expression 2 d later. Bars show the mean + SD from at least two individual mice per group. Histogram overlay shows representative PD-L1 expression on ILC2s. (e) ILC2s were isolated from lungs of naive WT and PD-L1−/− mice, expanded in vitro for 5 d (IL-2, IL-7, and IL-33; 10 ng/ml each), stimulated for the final 5 h with PMA/ionomycin in the presence of monensin, and stained intracellularly for IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Plots are gated on live linCD90+KLRG1+ST2+ cells. FMO, fluorescence minus one. (f) Bar graph shows the mean + SEM IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 producers within the PD-L1 and PD-L1+ population within the ILC2s from lungs of nine N. brasiliensis–infected WT mice from two experiments. Contour plots show representative gating of PD-L1 and PD-L1+ cells and flow cytometric signal for intracellular IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Student’s t test was used to analyze data, and p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, not significant.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
PD-L1:PD-1 interaction promotes Th2 polarization in CD4 T cells in vitro. (a) Sort-purified ILC2s from the lungs of day 5 N. brasiliensis–infected WT (PD-L1 expression: see Fig. 1 c, day 5, top) and PD-L1−/− mice and naive WT CD3+CD4+CD44 T cells (PD-1 expression: see Fig. 1 c, day 0, bottom) were co-cultured (or T cells only) for 5 d. GATA3 expression in T cells was analyzed by intranuclear staining. Cells were restimulated with PMA/ionomycin, and IL-13 was stained intracellularly and analyzed by flow cytometry. Bar graphs show the mean + SEM of 13 and four to eight independent replicates from three experiments, respectively. (b) Purified naive, CellTrace Violet–labeled OT-2 T cells were cultured for 5 d in the presence of IL-2 (20 ng/ml), anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (5 µg/ml/1 µg/ml; “pos.”), WT ILC2 + OVA (10 µg/ml), or PD-L1−/− ILC2 + OVA (10 µg/ml). Histograms show the dilution of CellTrace Violet in CD4+ T cells. Bar graph shows the mean + SEM of six samples from two experiments. (c) WT or Pdcd1−/− CD4+ T cells were cultured alone or together with WT ILCs as in a. Bar graph shows the mean + SEM of six replicates. (d) Cells were co-cultured as in a in Transwell or normal plates (“direct” cell–cell contact). Bar graph shows the mean + SEM of six samples from two experiments. (e) Purified naive CD4 T cells were cultured under nonpolarizing conditions for 24 h in the presence of anti-CD3 antibody (5 µg/ml) with recombinant mouse PD-L1-Fc (5 µg/ml; red bars) or control protein (5 µg/ml; blue bars). Cells were stained intranuclearly for indicated transcription factors. Bar graphs show the mean + SEM of four to nine replicates from three experiments. (f) T cells from IL-4Ra−/− mice were cultured as in e. Bar graph shows the mean + SEM of five replicates from two experiments. (g) Naive T cells from WT and Pdcd1−/− mice were cultured as described in e and analyzed for GATA3 expression 24 h later. Bars show the mean + SEM of five replicates. (h) WT CD4 T cells were cultured for 5 d under nonpolarizing and Th1-, Th2-, and Th17-polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of recombinant PD-L1 and analyzed for indicated transcription factors and cytokines. Heat maps depict means of six replicates. Bar graphs are shown in Fig. S2. (i) Naive WT CD4 T cells were cultured under nonpolarizing conditions in the presence of control recombinant hIgG-Fc, PD-L1-Fc, PD-L2-Fc, or PD-1-Fc (5 µg/ml each) and analyzed for GATA3 expression by flow cytometry 24 h later. Bars show the mean + SEM of six replicates. Student’s t test was used to analyze data, and p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, not significant.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
PD-L1–expressing ILC2s control the PD-1 checkpoint toward Th2 polarization during helminth infection. (a) Rag2−/−Il2rg−/− mice received naive CD4 T cells alone or together with WT or PD-L1−/− ILC2s and were infected with N. brasiliensis the next day. Lungs were analyzed for GATA3+ CD4 T cells and eosinophils (b) by flow cytometry. Bar graphs show the mean + SEM of five individual mice per group from two independent experiments. (c) Intestinal worm burden and fecal egg counts (d) 7 d after infection in mice receiving CD4 T cells alone (light gray), WT CD4 T cells and PD-L1+/+ (black bars) or PD-L1−/− (open bars) ILC2s, or Pdcd1−/− CD4 T cells and WT ILC2s (dark gray). Bars show the mean + SEM of four to nine mice per group from three experiments. (e) Representative dot plots showing the PD-L1 expression on lung ILC2s (gated on live linCD45+CD90+ST2+KLRG1+ cells) from infected WT, PD-L1−/− and PDL1fl/-IL7RαCre/+ mice 5 d after infection. FMO, fluorescence minus one. (f) PD-L1 expression on lung ILC2s in WT, PD-L1fl/fl, PD-L1−/−, and PDL1fl/-IL7RαCre/+ mice. Bar graphs show the mean + SD of at least three mice per group. (g) Control and PDL1fl/-IL7RαCre/+ mice were infected with N. brasiliensis, and worm burden was analyzed 7 d after infection. Bar graph shows the mean + SEM of nine mice from three experiments. (h) Th2 cell IL-4-, IL-5-, and IL-13 production (i) in lung CD4 T cells or ILC2s (j) and lung eosinophil infiltration (k) were analyzed by flow cytometry 5 d after infection. Bar graphs show the mean + SEM of six to 10 mice from three independently performed experiments. (l) Periodic acid–Schiff staining of fixed small intestinal tissue 5 d after N. brasiliensis infection. Bar graph shows the mean + SD of three mice, with 5 crypt-villus units counted per mouse. Bars, 1 mm. (m) WT or PDL1fl/flID2CreERT2 mice were left untreated or injected i.p. with tamoxifen before infection with N. brasiliensis. Bar graphs show the mean + SEM of PD-L1 expression on lung ILC2s (left) and CD4 T cells (middle) and worm burden 7 d after infection (right) from at least three mice per group from two experiments. Student’s t test was used to analyze data, and p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. *, P < 0.05, ns, not significant. In c, d, and m, ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance. #, P < 0.01.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Working model. Helminth- or allergen-inflicted epithelial damage leads to the release of IL-33, which activates ILC2s via ST2. ILCs up-regulate PD-L1 and interact with CD4 T cells on site to promote increased GATA3 expression and thereby commit them to IL-13–producing Th2 cells. IL-13 released from both cell types then activates the epithelium to promote worm expulsion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agata Y., Kawasaki A., Nishimura H., Ishida Y., Tsubata T., Yagita H., and Honjo T.. 1996. Expression of the PD-1 antigen on the surface of stimulated mouse T and B lymphocytes. Int. Immunol. 8:765–772. 10.1093/intimm/8.5.765 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amarnath S., Mangus C.W., Wang J.C., Wei F., He A., Kapoor V., Foley J.E., Massey P.R., Felizardo T.C., Riley J.L., et al. . 2011. The PDL1-PD1 axis converts human TH1 cells into regulatory T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 3:111ra120 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003130 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anthony R.M., Rutitzky L.I., Urban J.F. Jr., Stadecker M.J., and Gause W.C.. 2007. Protective immune mechanisms in helminth infection. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7:975–987. 10.1038/nri2199 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barber D.L., Wherry E.J., Masopust D., Zhu B., Allison J.P., Sharpe A.H., Freeman G.J., and Ahmed R.. 2006. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature. 439:682–687. 10.1038/nature04444 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barner M., Mohrs M., Brombacher F., and Kopf M.. 1998. Differences between IL-4R alpha-deficient and IL-4-deficient mice reveal a role for IL-13 in the regulation of Th2 responses. Curr. Biol. 8:669–672. 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70256-8 - DOI - PubMed