Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 31;19(7):e276.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.6937.

Enabling Open Science for Health Research: Collaborative Informatics Environment for Learning on Health Outcomes (CIELO)

Affiliations

Enabling Open Science for Health Research: Collaborative Informatics Environment for Learning on Health Outcomes (CIELO)

Philip Payne et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: There is an emergent and intensive dialogue in the United States with regard to the accessibility, reproducibility, and rigor of health research. This discussion is also closely aligned with the need to identify sustainable ways to expand the national research enterprise and to generate actionable results that can be applied to improve the nation's health. The principles and practices of Open Science offer a promising path to address both goals by facilitating (1) increased transparency of data and methods, which promotes research reproducibility and rigor; and (2) cumulative efficiencies wherein research tools and the output of research are combined to accelerate the delivery of new knowledge in proximal domains, thereby resulting in greater productivity and a reduction in redundant research investments.

Objectives: AcademyHealth's Electronic Data Methods (EDM) Forum implemented a proof-of-concept open science platform for health research called the Collaborative Informatics Environment for Learning on Health Outcomes (CIELO).

Methods: The EDM Forum conducted a user-centered design process to elucidate important and high-level requirements for creating and sustaining an open science paradigm.

Results: By implementing CIELO and engaging a variety of potential users in its public beta testing, the EDM Forum has been able to elucidate a broad range of stakeholder needs and requirements related to the use of an open science platform focused on health research in a variety of "real world" settings.

Conclusions: Our initial design and development experience over the course of the CIELO project has provided the basis for a vigorous dialogue between stakeholder community members regarding the capabilities that will add the greatest value to an open science platform for the health research community. A number of important questions around user incentives, sustainability, and scalability will require further community dialogue and agreement.

Keywords: healthcare research; information dissemination; open access to information; reproducibility of results; social networking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the Collaborative Informatics Environment for Learning on Health Outcomes (CIELO) architecture and workflow, emphasizing the bundling of data and analytic tools and the provisions of social search capabilities.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JP. What does research reproducibility mean? Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 01;8(341):341ps12. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iqbal SA, Wallach JD, Khoury MJ, Schully SD, Ioannidis JP. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature. PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan;14(1):e1002333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, Buck S, Chambers CD, Chin G, Christensen G, Contestabile M, Dafoe A, Eich E, Freese J, Glennerster R, Goroff D, Green DP, Hesse B, Humphreys M, Ishiyama J, Karlan D, Kraut A, Lupia A, Mabry P, Madon TA, Malhotra N, Mayo-Wilson E, McNutt M, Miguel E, Paluck EL, Simonsohn U, Soderberg C, Spellman BA, Turitto J, VandenBos G, Vazire S, Wagenmakers EJ, Wilson R, Yarkoni T. Scientific standards. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422–5. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26113702 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warren E. Strengthening research through data sharing. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 04;375(5):401–3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607282. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holve E. Open science and eGEMs: our role in supporting a culture of collaboration in learning health systems. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2016;4(1):1271. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1271. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27429993 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources