Offering A Price Transparency Tool Did Not Reduce Overall Spending Among California Public Employees And Retirees

Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Aug 1;36(8):1401-1407. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1636.

Abstract

Insurers, employers, and states increasingly encourage price transparency so that patients can compare health care prices across providers. However, the evidence on whether price transparency tools encourage patients to receive lower-cost care and reduce overall spending remains limited and mixed. We examined the experience of a large insured population that was offered a price transparency tool, focusing on a set of "shoppable" services (lab tests, office visits, and advanced imaging services). Overall, offering the tool was not associated with lower shoppable services spending. Only 12 percent of employees who were offered the tool used it in the first fifteen months after it was introduced, and use of the tool was not associated with lower prices for lab tests or office visits. The average price paid for imaging services preceded by a price search was 14 percent lower than that paid for imaging services not preceded by a price search. However, only 1 percent of those who received advanced imaging conducted a price search. Simply offering a price transparency tool is not sufficient to meaningfully decrease health care prices or spending.

Keywords: Consumer Issues; Cost of Health Care; Health Economics; Health Spending.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Access to Information*
  • California
  • Commerce / economics
  • Commerce / statistics & numerical data*
  • Cost Savings / statistics & numerical data*
  • Delivery of Health Care / economics
  • Female
  • Health Expenditures / statistics & numerical data*
  • Health Expenditures / trends
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged