Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 10;15(1):151.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0908-3.

Characterizing measles transmission in India: a dynamic modeling study using verbal autopsy data

Affiliations

Characterizing measles transmission in India: a dynamic modeling study using verbal autopsy data

Stéphane Verguet et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Decreasing trends in measles mortality have been reported in recent years. However, such estimates of measles mortality have depended heavily on assumed regional measles case fatality risks (CFRs) and made little use of mortality data from low- and middle-income countries in general and India, the country with the highest measles burden globally, in particular.

Methods: We constructed a dynamic model of measles transmission in India with parameters that were empirically inferred using spectral analysis from a time series of measles mortality extracted from the Million Death Study, an ongoing longitudinal study recording deaths across 2.4 million Indian households and attributing causes of death using verbal autopsy. The model was then used to estimate the measles CFR, the number of measles deaths, and the impact of vaccination in 2000-2015 among under-five children in India and in the states of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh (UP), two states with large populations and the highest numbers of measles deaths in India.

Results: We obtained the following estimated CFRs among under-five children for the year 2005: 0.63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-1.00%) for India as a whole, 0.62% (0.38-1.00%) for Bihar, and 1.19% (0.80-1.75%) for UP. During 2000-2015, we estimated that 607,000 (95% CI: 383,000-958,000) under-five deaths attributed to measles occurred in India as a whole. If no routine vaccination or supplemental immunization activities had occurred from 2000 to 2015, an additional 1.6 (1.0-2.6) million deaths for under-five children would have occurred across India.

Conclusions: We developed a data- and model-driven estimation of the historical measles dynamics, CFR, and vaccination impact in India, extracting the periodicity of epidemics using spectral and coherence analysis, which allowed us to infer key parameters driving measles transmission dynamics and mortality.

Keywords: Case fatality risk; Child health; Immunization; India; Mathematical modeling; Measles; Supplementary immunization activities; Vaccine-preventable diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Anonymous secondary data were used (Additional file 1: Web appendix I provides MDS research ethics details).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Weekly measles deaths recorded over the period 2000–2003, for India (a), Bihar (b), and Uttar Pradesh (c), since the day of the first measles death (source Million Death Study), with their associated frequency spectra with strength of harmonic on y-axis and period up to 2 years on x-axis. The black lines correspond to the raw data and corresponding spectra, while the red line denotes the data and spectra post-detrending with the Baxter-King filter
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pooled coherence estimate across five periods (0.5, 0.6, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5 years) for India (a), Bihar (b), and Uttar Pradesh (c), plotted against estimated basic reproduction number (R 0) and amplitude of the forcing term (Amp or a 0). Pink indicates a better match to periodicity in the mortality data. The location of the maximum coherence is identified with an asterisk (*), and the 95% significance contour (coherence = 0.11) is marked in dark blue
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pooled coherence across five periods (0.5, 0.6, 0.75, 1.0, and 1.5 years) plotted against estimated case fatality risk (CFR) calculated from corresponding R 0 and a 0 for India (a), Bihar (b), and Uttar Pradesh (c). The left and right green lines delimit the range of the CFR where coherence is above the 95% significance level. The middle green line indicates the CFR for which the highest pooled coherence was estimated. The bottom red line indicates the upper 95% significance limit for the coherence function

Similar articles

  • Measles mortality in high and low burden districts of India: estimates from a nationally representative study of over 12,000 child deaths.
    Morris SK, Awasthi S, Kumar R, Shet A, Khera A, Nakhaee F, Ram U, Brandao JR, Jha P; MDS Collaborators. Morris SK, et al. Vaccine. 2013 Sep 23;31(41):4655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Jul 19. Vaccine. 2013. PMID: 23876496
  • Measles case fatality rate in Bihar, India, 2011-12.
    Murhekar MV, Ahmad M, Shukla H, Abhishek K, Perry RT, Bose AS, Shimpi R, Kumar A, Kaliaperumal K, Sethi R, Selvaraj V, Kamaraj P, Routray S, Das VN, Menabde N, Bahl S. Murhekar MV, et al. PLoS One. 2014 May 13;9(5):e96668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096668. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24824641 Free PMC article.
  • Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
    Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Adair T, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Barker-Collo S, Bartels DH, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, Bhalla K, Bikbov B, Bin Abdulhak A, Birbeck G, Blyth F, Bolliger I, Boufous S, Bucello C, Burch M, Burney P, Carapetis J, Chen H, Chou D, Chugh SS, Coffeng LE, Colan SD, Colquhoun S, Colson KE, Condon J, Connor MD, Cooper LT, Corriere M, Cortinovis M, de Vaccaro KC, Couser W, Cowie BC, Criqui MH, Cross M, Dabhadkar KC, Dahodwala N, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Delossantos A, Denenberg J, Des Jarlais DC, Dharmaratne SD, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Duber H, Ebel B, Erwin PJ, Espindola P, Ezzati M, Feigin V, Flaxman AD, Forouzanfar MH, Fowkes FG, Franklin R, Fransen M, Freeman MK, Gabriel SE, Gakidou E, Gaspari F, Gillum RF, Gonzalez-Medina D, Halasa YA, Haring D, Harrison JE, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Hoen B, Hotez PJ, Hoy D, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jasrasaria R, Jayaraman S, Johns N, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Keren A, Khoo JP, Knowlton LM, Kobusingye O, Koranteng A, Krishnamurthi R, Lipnick M, Lipshultz SE, Ohno SL, Mabweijano J, MacIntyre MF, Mallinger L, March … See abstract for full author list ➔ Lozano R, et al. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 23245604 Free PMC article.
  • Measles mortality in India: a review of community based studies.
    Singh J, Sharma RS, Verghese T. Singh J, et al. J Commun Dis. 1994 Dec;26(4):203-14. J Commun Dis. 1994. PMID: 7759802 Review.
  • Burden, differentials, and causes of child deaths in India.
    Lahariya C, Paul VK. Lahariya C, et al. Indian J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;77(11):1312-21. doi: 10.1007/s12098-010-0185-z. Epub 2010 Sep 10. Indian J Pediatr. 2010. PMID: 20830536 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global Immunization Vision and Strategy, 2006–2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Global Measles and Rubella Strategic Plan 2012–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
    1. Orenstein WA, Hinman AR, Strebel PJ. Measles: the need for 2 opportunities for prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:320–1. doi: 10.1086/498321. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Measles vaccines: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009;84:349–60. - PubMed
    1. Wolfson LJ, Strebel PM, Gacic-Dobo M, et al. Has the 2005 measles mortality reduction goal been achieved? A natural history modelling study. Lancet. 2007;369:191–200. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60107-X. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms