Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Apr;51(3):282-292.
doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1295-2. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and diagnostic test accuracy of three frailty screening tools : PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and Groningen Frailty Indicator

Affiliations
Comparative Study

German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and diagnostic test accuracy of three frailty screening tools : PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and Groningen Frailty Indicator

Tobias Braun et al. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Routine screening for frailty could be used to timely identify older people with increased vulnerability und corresponding medical needs.

Objective: The aim of this study was the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PRISMA-7 questionnaire, the FRAIL scale and the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) into the German language as well as a preliminary analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of these instruments used to screen for frailty.

Methods: A diagnostic cross-sectional study was performed. The instrument translation into German followed a standardized process. Prefinal versions were clinically tested on older adults who gave structured in-depth feedback on the scales in order to compile a final revision of the German language scale versions. For the analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (criterion validity), PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and GFI were considered the index tests. Two reference tests were applied to assess frailty, either based on Fried's model of a Physical Frailty Phenotype or on the model of deficit accumulation, expressed in a Frailty Index.

Results: Prefinal versions of the German translations of each instrument were produced and completed by 52 older participants (mean age: 73 ± 6 years). Some minor issues concerning comprehensibility and semantics of the scales were identified and resolved. Using the Physical Frailty Phenotype (frailty prevalence: 4%) criteria as a reference standard, the accuracy of the instruments was excellent (area under the curve AUC >0.90). Taking the Frailty Index (frailty prevalence: 23%) as the reference standard, the accuracy was good (AUC between 0.73 and 0.88).

Conclusion: German language versions of PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and GFI have been established and preliminary results indicate sufficient diagnostic test accuracy that needs to be further established.

Keywords: Frail elderly; Outcome measure; Rehabilitation; Sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Age Ageing. 2015 Jan;44(1):148-52 - PubMed
    1. Ageing Res Rev. 2015 May;21:78-94 - PubMed
    1. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56 - PubMed
    1. BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 31;10:176 - PubMed
    1. J Nutr Health Aging. 2014 May;18(5):453-4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources