The Use of Error and Uncertainty Methods in the Medical Laboratory

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Jan 26;56(2):209-219. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0341.

Abstract

Error methods - compared with uncertainty methods - offer simpler, more intuitive and practical procedures for calculating measurement uncertainty and conducting quality assurance in laboratory medicine. However, uncertainty methods are preferred in other fields of science as reflected by the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. When laboratory results are used for supporting medical diagnoses, the total uncertainty consists only partially of analytical variation. Biological variation, pre- and postanalytical variation all need to be included. Furthermore, all components of the measuring procedure need to be taken into account. Performance specifications for diagnostic tests should include the diagnostic uncertainty of the entire testing process. Uncertainty methods may be particularly useful for this purpose but have yet to show their strength in laboratory medicine. The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the pros and cons of error and uncertainty methods as groundwork for future consensus on their use in practical performance specifications. Error and uncertainty methods are complementary when evaluating measurement data.

Keywords: measurement uncertainty; performance specification; quality control; total error.

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / standards*
  • Delphi Technique
  • Humans
  • Medical Errors*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Uncertainty*