Highly efficient gene inactivation by adenoviral CRISPR/Cas9 in human primary cells
- PMID: 28800587
- PMCID: PMC5553774
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182974
Highly efficient gene inactivation by adenoviral CRISPR/Cas9 in human primary cells
Abstract
Phenotypic assays using human primary cells are highly valuable tools for target discovery and validation in drug discovery. Expression knockdown (KD) of such targets in these assays allows the investigation of their role in models of disease processes. Therefore, efficient and fast modes of protein KD in phenotypic assays are required. The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been shown to be a versatile and efficient means of gene inactivation in immortalized cell lines. Here we describe the use of adenoviral (AdV) CRISPR/Cas9 vectors for efficient gene inactivation in two human primary cell types, normal human lung fibroblasts and human bronchial epithelial cells. The effects of gene inactivation were studied in the TGF-β-induced fibroblast to myofibroblast transition assay (FMT) and the epithelial to mesenchymal transition assay (EMT), which are SMAD3 dependent and reflect pathogenic mechanisms observed in fibrosis. Co-transduction (co-TD) of AdV Cas9 with SMAD3-targeting guide RNAs (gRNAs) resulted in fast and efficient genome editing judged by insertion/deletion (indel) formation, as well as significant reduction of SMAD3 protein expression and nuclear translocation. This led to phenotypic changes downstream of SMAD3 inhibition, including substantially decreased alpha smooth muscle actin and fibronectin 1 expression, which are markers for FMT and EMT, respectively. A direct comparison between co-TD of separate Cas9 and gRNA AdV, versus TD with a single "all-in-one" Cas9/gRNA AdV, revealed that both methods achieve similar levels of indel formation. These data demonstrate that AdV CRISPR/Cas9 is a useful and efficient tool for protein KD in human primary cell phenotypic assays. The use of AdV CRISPR/Cas9 may offer significant advantages over the current existing tools and should enhance target discovery and validation opportunities.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Gene Silencing in Cultured Human Epithelia.Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2260:37-47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1182-1_4. Methods Mol Biol. 2021. PMID: 33405030
-
Gene Therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 Coming to Age for HIV Cure.AIDS Rev. 2017 Oct-Dec;19(3):167-172. AIDS Rev. 2017. PMID: 29019352
-
Method for Dual Viral Vector Mediated CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Disruption in Primary Human Endothelial Cells.Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 15;7:42127. doi: 10.1038/srep42127. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28198371 Free PMC article.
-
[CRISPR/CAS9, the King of Genome Editing Tools].Mol Biol (Mosk). 2017 Jul-Aug;51(4):582-594. doi: 10.7868/S0026898417040036. Mol Biol (Mosk). 2017. PMID: 28900076 Review. Russian.
-
CRISPR/Cas9 in Genome Editing and Beyond.Annu Rev Biochem. 2016 Jun 2;85:227-64. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014607. Epub 2016 Apr 25. Annu Rev Biochem. 2016. PMID: 27145843 Review.
Cited by
-
Viral Delivery Systems for CRISPR.Viruses. 2019 Jan 4;11(1):28. doi: 10.3390/v11010028. Viruses. 2019. PMID: 30621179 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Broad Application of CRISPR Cas9 in Infectious Diseases of Central Nervous System.J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;14(4):578-594. doi: 10.1007/s11481-019-09878-7. Epub 2019 Sep 11. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31512166 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exosome/Liposome-like Nanoparticles: New Carriers for CRISPR Genome Editing in Plants.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 12;22(14):7456. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147456. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34299081 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Modeling Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Using "Good-Fit" Genome-Editing Tools.Cells. 2020 Dec 1;9(12):2572. doi: 10.3390/cells9122572. Cells. 2020. PMID: 33271878 Free PMC article. Review.
-
EMT signaling: potential contribution of CRISPR/Cas gene editing.Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020 Jul;77(14):2701-2722. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03449-3. Epub 2020 Feb 1. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020. PMID: 32008085 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Es H van, Arts G. Biology calls the targets: combining RNAi and disease biology. Drug Discov Today. 2005;10: 1385–1391. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03590-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Berns K, Hijmans EM, Mullenders J, Brummelkamp TR, Velds A, Heimerikx M, et al. A large-scale RNAi screen in human cells identifies new components of the p53 pathway. Nature. 2004;428: 431–437. doi: 10.1038/nature02371 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jackson AL, Bartz SR, Schelter J, Kobayashi S V, Burchard J, Mao M, et al. Expression profiling reveals off-target gene regulation by RNAi. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21: 635–637. doi: 10.1038/nbt831 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ohneda K, Moriguchi T, Ohmori S, Ishijima Y, Satoh H, Philipsen S, et al. Transcription factor GATA1 is dispensable for mast cell differentiation in adult mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34: 1812–26. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01524-13 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gaj T, Gersbach C a., Barbas CF. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;31: 397–405. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
