Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul-Aug;56(4):673-691.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21794.

The Relationship Between HR Capabilities and Quality of Patient Care: The Mediating Role of Proactive Work Behaviors

Affiliations

The Relationship Between HR Capabilities and Quality of Patient Care: The Mediating Role of Proactive Work Behaviors

Naresh Khatri et al. Hum Resour Manage. 2017 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Based on theoretical frameworks of resource-based theory, dynamic capabilities, and behavioral perspective on human resource management, we developed a multidimensional construct of human resource (HR) capabilities and tested its relationship with quality of patient care using a national sample of U.S. hospitals. The data on HR capabilities were collected from senior managers (421 individuals nested in 279 hospitals) representing both the administrative and clinical sides of the hospitals. The data on quality of patient care were gathered from two unique sources - patients of 207 hospitals who reported the data via the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey and 421 senior managers of 279 hospitals. Our analyses using structural equation modeling suggests that the positive relationship of HR capabilities with quality of patient care is mediated by proactive behaviors of health care workers. Implications of the study findings for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords: HR capabilities; dynamic capabilities; quality of patient care; resource-based theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Structural Model with Manager-Reported Quality of Patient Care
Note. Manager QPC = Manager-Reported Quality of Patient Care. All reported coefficients are standardized path coefficients. N = 279; **p < .01; * p < .05
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Structural Model with the Patient-Reported Quality of Patient Care
Note. Patient QPC = Patient-Reported Quality of Patient Care (data collected from Hospital Compare Website). Control variables (Bed size, ownership, region of location) and common method latent factor are not shown for ease of presentation. All reported coefficients are standardized path coefficients. N = 207; **p < .01; * p < .05

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103:411–423.
    1. Antila EM, Kakkonen A. Factors affecting the role of HR managers in international mergers and acquisitions. Personnel Review. 2008;37:280–299.
    1. Bagozzi RP, Edwards JR. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods. 1998;1(1):45–87.
    1. Baluch AM, Salge TO, Piening EP. Untangling the relationship between HRM and hospital performance: the mediating role of attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2013;24(16):3038–3061.
    1. Barney JB, Ketchen DJ, Jr, Wright M. The future of resource-based theory: revitalization or decline? Journal of Management. 2011;37(5):1299–1315.

LinkOut - more resources