Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 28809936
- PMCID: PMC5557428
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002369
Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background and objective: Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is very common, with a lifetime prevalence between 51% and 80%. In majority, it is nonspecific in nature and multifactorial in etiology. Pregabalin (PG) and Gabapentin (GB) are gabapentinoids that have demonstrated benefit in neuropathic pain conditions. Despite no clear rationale, they are increasingly used for nonspecific CLBP. They necessitate prolonged use and are associated with adverse effects and increased cost. Recent guidelines from the National Health Service (NHS), England, expressed concerns on their off-label use, in addition to the risk of misuse. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids in adult CLBP patients.
Methods: Electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched from their inception until December 20th, 2016. We included randomized control trials reporting the use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of CLBP of >3 months duration, in adult patients. Study selection and data extraction was performed independently by paired reviewers. Outcomes were guided by Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials guidelines, with pain relief and safety as the primary outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported in 3 or more studies. Outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and I2 in percentage representing the percentage variability in effect estimates that could be explained by heterogeneity. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was used to assess the quality of evidence.
Results: Out of 1,385 citations, eight studies were included. Based on the interventions and comparators, studies were analyzed in 3 different groups. GB compared with placebo (3 studies, n = 185) showed minimal improvement of pain (MD = 0.22 units, 95% CI [-0.5 to 0.07] I2 = 0%; GRADE: very low). Three studies compared PG with other types of analgesic medication (n = 332) and showed greater improvement in the other analgesic group (MD = 0.42 units, 95% CI [0.20 to 0.64] I2 = 0; GRADE: very low). Studies using PG as an adjuvant (n = 423) were not pooled due to heterogeneity, but the largest of them showed no benefit of adding PG to tapentadol. There were no deaths or hospitalizations reported. Compared with placebo, the following adverse events were more commonly reported with GB: dizziness-(RR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.17 to 3.37], I2 = 49); fatigue (RR = 1.85, 95% CI [1.12 to 3.05], I2 = 0); difficulties with mentation (RR = 3.34, 95% CI [1.54 to 7.25], I2 = 0); and visual disturbances (RR = 5.72, 95% CI [1.94 to 16.91], I2 = 0). The number needed to harm with 95% CI for dizziness, fatigue, difficulties with mentation, and visual disturbances were 7 (4 to 30), 8 (4 to 44), 6 (4 to 15), and 6 (4 to 13) respectively. The GRADE evidence quality was noted to be very low for dizziness and fatigue, low for difficulties with mentation, and moderate for visual disturbances. Functional and emotional improvements were reported by few studies and showed no significant improvements.
Conclusions and relevance: Existing evidence on the use of gabapentinoids in CLBP is limited and demonstrates significant risk of adverse effects without any demonstrated benefit. Given the lack of efficacy, risks, and costs associated, the use of gabapentinoids for CLBP merits caution. There is need for large high-quality trials to more definitively inform this issue.
Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42016034040.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Gabapentinoids for chronic low back pain: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 10;6(11):e013200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013200. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 28186946 Free PMC article.
-
Antiepileptic drugs for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD012536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012536.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28779491 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A meta-analysis of the preoperative use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of acute postoperative pain following spinal surgery.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(37):e8031. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008031. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28906391 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The efficacy of preoperative administration of gabapentin/pregabalin in improving pain after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 30;17(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1231-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016. PMID: 27577678 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 27;2014(4):CD007938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 09;6:CD007938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub4 PMID: 24771480 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
A Meta-analysis Exploring the Efficacy of Neuropathic Pain Medication for Low Back Pain or Spine-Related Leg Pain: Is Efficacy Dependent on the Presence of Neuropathic Pain?Drugs. 2024 Oct 26:10.1007/s40265-024-02085-6. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02085-6. Online ahead of print. Drugs. 2024. PMID: 39455546 Free PMC article.
-
Rat Sympathetic Neuron Calcium Channels Are Insensitive to Gabapentin.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;17(9):1237. doi: 10.3390/ph17091237. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39338399 Free PMC article.
-
Gabapentinoid prescriptions for neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain in Lebanon.Future Sci OA. 2024 May 14;10(1):FSO960. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2023-0219. eCollection 2024. Future Sci OA. 2024. PMID: 38817381 Free PMC article.
-
Secular trends in gabapentinoid dispensing by compensated workers with low back pain: a retrospective cohort study.Occup Environ Med. 2024 Jun 3;81(5):245-251. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109369. Occup Environ Med. 2024. PMID: 38782576 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of adverse outcomes during gabapentinoid therapy and factors associated with increased risk in UK primary care using the clinical practice research datalink: a cohort study.Pain. 2024 Oct 1;165(10):2282-2290. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003239. Epub 2024 Apr 11. Pain. 2024. PMID: 38662459 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;344(5):363–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102013440508 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hooten WM, Cohen SP. Evaluation and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Clinically Focused Review for Primary Care Specialists. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(12):1699–718. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.10.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):2028–37. doi: 10.1002/art.34347 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Morlion B. Chronic low back pain: pharmacological, interventional and surgical strategies. Nature reviews Neurology. 2013;9(8):462–73. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.130 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
