National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease
- PMID: 28814455
- PMCID: PMC5595275
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004357
National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether providing remote neurologic care into the homes of people with Parkinson disease (PD) is feasible, beneficial, and valuable.
Methods: In a 1-year randomized controlled trial, we compared usual care to usual care supplemented by 4 virtual visits via video conferencing from a remote specialist into patients' homes. Primary outcome measures were feasibility, as measured by the proportion who completed at least one virtual visit and the proportion of virtual visits completed on time; and efficacy, as measured by the change in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, a quality of life scale. Secondary outcomes included quality of care, caregiver burden, and time and travel savings.
Results: A total of 927 individuals indicated interest, 210 were enrolled, and 195 were randomized. Participants had recently seen a specialist (73%) and were largely college-educated (73%) and white (96%). Ninety-five (98% of the intervention group) completed at least one virtual visit, and 91% of 388 virtual visits were completed. Quality of life did not improve in those receiving virtual house calls (0.3 points worse on a 100-point scale; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.0 to 2.7 points; p = 0.78) nor did quality of care or caregiver burden. Each virtual house call saved patients a median of 88 minutes (95% CI 70-120; p < 0.0001) and 38 miles per visit (95% CI 36-56; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Providing remote neurologic care directly into the homes of people with PD was feasible and was neither more nor less efficacious than usual in-person care. Virtual house calls generated great interest and provided substantial convenience.
Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT02038959.
Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with PD, virtual house calls from a neurologist are feasible and do not significantly change quality of life compared to in-person visits. The study is rated Class III because it was not possible to mask patients to visit type.
© 2017 American Academy of Neurology.
Figures
Comment in
-
The virtual house call: A 21st-century innovation in the care of patients with Parkinson disease.Neurology. 2017 Sep 12;89(11):1103-1104. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004366. Epub 2017 Aug 16. Neurology. 2017. PMID: 28814459 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Do Video House Calls With a Specialist Help Get Care to People With Parkinson's Disease? [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2018 Aug. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2018 Aug. PMID: 36996273 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Virtual house calls for Parkinson disease (Connect.Parkinson): study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial.Trials. 2014 Nov 27;15:465. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-465. Trials. 2014. PMID: 25431346 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized controlled clinical trial of "virtual house calls" for Parkinson disease.JAMA Neurol. 2013 May;70(5):565-70. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.123. JAMA Neurol. 2013. PMID: 23479138 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
National Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual House Calls for People with Parkinson's Disease: Interest and Barriers.Telemed J E Health. 2016 Jul;22(7):590-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0191. Epub 2016 Feb 17. Telemed J E Health. 2016. PMID: 26886406 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: A multicenter noncontrolled cohort.Neurol Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;7(4):283-295. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000371. Neurol Clin Pract. 2017. PMID: 28840919 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Innovative technology-based interventions in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Oct;11(10):2548-2562. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52160. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024. PMID: 39236299 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic pain management during the COVID-19 pandemic: Can telemedicine replace in-person consultation? A prospective clinical study.Interv Pain Med. 2023 May 20;2(2):100252. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100252. eCollection 2023 Jun. Interv Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 39233716 Free PMC article.
-
Satisfaction with videoconferencing support for levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel: An observational study.Digit Health. 2024 Aug 30;10:20552076241271847. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271847. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39224799 Free PMC article.
-
Neurological Examination via Telemedicine: An Updated Review Focusing on Movement Disorders.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 9;60(6):958. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060958. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38929575 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Feasibility of regional center telehealth visits utilizing a rural research network in people with Parkinson's disease.J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Mar 25;8(1):e63. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.498. eCollection 2024. J Clin Transl Sci. 2024. PMID: 38655451 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of telehealth. N Engl J Med 2016;375:154–161. - PubMed
-
- Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. - PubMed
-
- Daschle T, Dorsey ER. The return of the house call. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:587–588. - PubMed
-
- Uscher-Pines L, Mehrotra A. Analysis of teladoc use seems to indicate expanded access to care for patients without prior connection to a provider. Health Aff 2014;33:258–264. - PubMed
-
- Wechsler LR. Advantages and limitations of teleneurology. JAMA Neurol 2015;72:349–354. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous