Protocol for an economic evaluation of the randomised controlled trial of culprit lesion only PCI versus immediate multivessel PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e014849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014849.

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion for patients with acute myocardial infarctions is an accepted practice. A majority of patients present with multivessel disease with additional relevant stenoses apart from the culprit lesion. In haemodynamically stable patients, there is increasing evidence from randomised trials to support the practice of immediate complete revascularisation. However, in the presence of cardiogenic shock, the optimal management strategy for additional non-culprit lesions is unknown. A multicentre randomised controlled trial, CULPRIT-SHOCK, is examining whether culprit vessel only PCI with potentially subsequent staged revascularisation is more effective than immediate multivessel PCI. This paper describes the intended economic evaluation of the trial.

Methods and analysis: The economic evaluation will be conducted using a pre-trial decision model and within-trial analysis. The modelling-based analysis will provide expected costs and health outcomes, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio over the lifetime for the cohort of patients included in the trial. The within-trial analysis will provide estimates of cost per life saved at 30 days and in 1 year, and estimates of health-related quality of life. Bootstrapping and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves will be used to address any uncertainty around these estimates. Different types of regression models within a generalised estimating equation framework will be used to examine how the total cost and quality-adjusted life years are explained by patients' characteristics, revascularisation strategy, country and centre. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be from the perspective of each country's national health services, where costs will be expressed in euros adjusted for purchasing power parity.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval for the study was granted by the local Ethics Committee at each recruiting centre. The economic evaluation analyses will be published in peer-reviewed journals of the concerned literature and communicated through the profiles of the authors at www.twitter.com and www.researchgate.net.

Trial registration number: NCT01927549; Pre-results.

Keywords: cardiogenic shock; cost-effectiveness; myocardial infarction.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Coronary Artery Disease / economics
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Emergency Medical Services / economics
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / complications
  • Myocardial Infarction / economics
  • Myocardial Infarction / pathology
  • Myocardial Infarction / therapy*
  • National Health Programs
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / economics*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years*
  • Research Design
  • Shock, Cardiogenic / complications*
  • Shock, Cardiogenic / economics

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01927549