Risk of low-dose radiation and the BEIR VII report: A critical review of what it does and doesn't say

Phys Med. 2017 Nov:43:153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

Abstract

This article briefly reviews the history behind the BEIR VII report and the use of the linear no-threshold hypothesis. The BEIR VII committee considered four primary sources of data on the stochastic effects of ionizing radiation. These were environmental studies, occupational studies, medical studies and studies on the atomic bomb survivors. These sources are briefly reviewed along with key studies that run counter to the LNT hypothesis. We review many of the assumptions, hypotheses and subjective decisions used to generate risk estimates in the BEIR VII report. Position statement by the Health Physics Society, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, and UNSCEAR support the conclusion that the risk estimates in the BEIR VII report should not be used for estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation.

Keywords: BEIR VII; Cancer risk assessment; Ionizing radiation; Linear no-threshold.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Humans
  • Radiation Dosage*
  • Radiobiology / methods*
  • Risk
  • Stochastic Processes