Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183812.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183812. eCollection 2017.

GSTM1/GSTT1 double-null genotype increases risk of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A genetic association study in Brazilian patients

Affiliations
Free PMC article

GSTM1/GSTT1 double-null genotype increases risk of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A genetic association study in Brazilian patients

Denise S Pinheiro et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The role of oxidative stress in schizophrenia has been demonstrated, particularly in subjects with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). In such patients, the decreased levels of antioxidants in conjunction with the increased generation of reactive oxygen species in the brain exposes the neurons to a higher risk of damage.

Methods and findings: We evaluated the association of deletion polymorphisms of two genes of the antioxidant Glutathione S-Transferase family, GSTT1 and GSTM1, with susceptibility to TRS. A total of 54 TRS patients (mean age 38.7 years) and 78 healthy control subjects (mean age 39.0 years) were enrolled in this study. The subjects were matched by sex, age, and smoking and alcohol consumption habits. In the case group, the frequencies of GSTT1-null and GSTM1-null genotypes were 24.1 and 51.9%, respectively, whereas for the control group, the frequencies were 12.8 and 46.2%, respectively. Analysis performed with respect to the risk of developing TRS associated with the GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletion polymorphisms, resulted in odds ratio (OR) values of 2.1 and 1.2, respectively. However, the association was not found to be significant (p = 0.1229 and p = 0.5916, respectively). The analysis performed with respect to the combined genotypes of GSTT1 and GSTM1 revealed that the double-null genotype confers a 4.6-fold increased risk of developing TRS (p = 0.0412).

Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate that a combination of GST deficiencies may play a role in enhanced susceptibility to TRS, and the present genotype of one of these genes may buffer the deficiency caused by the lack (null genotype) of the other. The results suggest that combined deletion polymorphisms of GSTT1 and GSTM1 can have implications in the prediction of the clinical course of the disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saha S, Chant D, Welham J, Mcgrath J. A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Schizophrenia. 2005; 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020141 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caspi A, Davidson M, Tamminga CA. Treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. France: Les Laboratoires Servier; 2004;6: 61–70. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181784/ - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakajima S, Takeuchi H, Fervaha G, Plitman E, Chung JK, Caravaggio F, et al. Comparative efficacy between clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics on depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: Analysis of the CATIE phase 2E data. Schizophr Res. Elsevier; 2015;161: 429–433. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.12.024 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dringen R. Metabolism and functions of glutathione in brain. Prog Neurobiol. 2000;62: 649–671. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(99)00060-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boskovic M, Vovk T, Kores Plesnicar B, Grabnar I. Oxidative Stress in Schizophrenia. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2011;9: 301–312. doi: 10.2174/157015911795596595 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

Grants and funding

This work was supported by grant (number: 201310267000014) from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do estado de Goiás (FAPEG - URL: http://www.fapeg.go.gov.br/). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.