Bivalirudin versus Heparin Monotherapy in Myocardial Infarction
- PMID: 28844201
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706443
Bivalirudin versus Heparin Monotherapy in Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
Background: The comparative efficacy of various anticoagulation strategies has not been clearly established in patients with acute myocardial infarction who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to current practice, which includes the use of radial-artery access for PCI and administration of potent P2Y12 inhibitors without the planned use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, registry-based, open-label clinical trial, we enrolled patients with either ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) who were undergoing PCI and receiving treatment with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor, prasugrel, or cangrelor) without the planned use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The patients were randomly assigned to receive bivalirudin or heparin during PCI, which was performed predominantly with the use of radial-artery access. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding during 180 days of follow-up.
Results: A total of 6006 patients (3005 with STEMI and 3001 with NSTEMI) were enrolled in the trial. At 180 days, a primary end-point event had occurred in 12.3% of the patients (369 of 3004) in the bivalirudin group and in 12.8% (383 of 3002) in the heparin group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.10; P=0.54). The results were consistent between patients with STEMI and those with NSTEMI and across other major subgroups. Myocardial infarction occurred in 2.0% of the patients in the bivalirudin group and in 2.4% in the heparin group (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.19; P=0.33), major bleeding in 8.6% and 8.6%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.19; P=0.98), definite stent thrombosis in 0.4% and 0.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.10; P=0.09), and death in 2.9% and 2.8%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.41; P=0.76).
Conclusions: Among patients undergoing PCI for myocardial infarction, the rate of the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding was not lower among those who received bivalirudin than among those who received heparin monotherapy. (Funded by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and others; VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu number, 2012-005260-10 ; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02311231 .).
Comment in
-
Procedural Anticoagulation in Myocardial Infarction.N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 21;377(12):1198-1200. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1709247. Epub 2017 Aug 27. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28844194 No abstract available.
-
Heparin versus bivalirudin for percutaneous coronary intervention: has the debate come to an end?J Thorac Dis. 2017 Nov;9(11):4305-4307. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.23. J Thorac Dis. 2017. PMID: 29268497 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Bivalirudin versus Heparin Monotherapy in Myocardial Infarction.N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):298. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1714520. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 29345439 No abstract available.
-
Bivalirudin versus Heparin Monotherapy in Myocardial Infarction.N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):298. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1714520. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 29345440 No abstract available.
-
Bivalirudin versus Heparin Monotherapy in Myocardial Infarction.N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):299. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1714520. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 29345441 No abstract available.
-
Bivalirudin versus Heparin Monotherapy in Myocardial Infarction.N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):299. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1714520. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 29345444 No abstract available.
-
Why did VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART not validate the results of HORIZONS?J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):35-37. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.126. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 29600016 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Does VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART invalidate the use of bivalirudin in myocardial infarction?J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):70-74. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.100. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 29600024 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Sep;8(6):492-501. doi: 10.1177/2048872618805663. Epub 2018 Oct 3. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019. PMID: 30281320 Clinical Trial.
-
Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Monotherapy in Elderly Patients With Myocardial Infarction: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART Trial.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr;13(4):e008671. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008671. Epub 2020 Mar 27. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32216471 Clinical Trial.
-
Bivalirudin versus heparin in non-ST and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-a registry-based randomized clinical trial in the SWEDEHEART registry (the VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART trial).Am Heart J. 2016 May;175:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Feb 20. Am Heart J. 2016. PMID: 27179722 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;114(2):250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.033. Epub 2014 May 2. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24890986 Review.
-
Heparin Versus Bivalirudin Monotherapy in the Setting of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Feb;50(2):141-51. doi: 10.1177/1060028015618206. Epub 2015 Dec 17. Ann Pharmacother. 2016. PMID: 26681442 Review.
Cited by
-
Use cases of registry-based randomized controlled trials-A review of the registries' contributions and constraints.Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70072. doi: 10.1111/cts.70072. Clin Transl Sci. 2024. PMID: 39558508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multifaceted Heparin: Diverse Applications beyond Anticoagulant Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Oct 12;17(10):1362. doi: 10.3390/ph17101362. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39459002 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How to make cardiology clinical trials more inclusive.Nat Med. 2024 Oct;30(10):2745-2755. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03273-3. Epub 2024 Oct 14. Nat Med. 2024. PMID: 39402268 Review.
-
Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients with or without bail-out GPI use: a pre-specified subgroup analysis from the BRIGHT-4 trial.BMC Med. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03579-6. BMC Med. 2024. PMID: 39334129 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in 2024.Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):335-375. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01036-y. Epub 2024 Sep 20. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024. PMID: 39302533 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous