Effect of female genital mutilation/cutting; types I and II on sexual function: case-controlled study
- PMID: 28854947
- PMCID: PMC5577780
- DOI: 10.1186/s12978-017-0371-9
Effect of female genital mutilation/cutting; types I and II on sexual function: case-controlled study
Abstract
Background: The existing literature is contradictory regarding effects of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) on sexual functions. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of type I and II FGM/C on sexual function of Egyptian women.
Methods: We recruited 197 cut women and 197 control women from those visiting Assiut University hospitals for different reasons. We asked each woman to fill the Arabic female sexual function index (FSFI) (a self reported 19-item questionnaire assessing the main domains of female sexual function). Genital Examination was done to confirm the type of FGM.
Results: Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) was found in 83.8% of FGM/C cases in contrast to 64.5% of the control. The total FSFI score in the FGM/C group (19.82 ± 7.1) was significantly lower than in the control group (23.34 ± 8.1). Concerning the types of FGM/C, type 73.6% of cases had type I and 26.4% had type II. Type I FGM/C was performed mainly by physicians (62.1%) while type II was performed mainly by midwives (44.4%). FSD was found in 83.4% of FGM/C I cases and in 84.6% of FGM/C II cases. There was no statistically significant difference between the two types of FGM/C as regards total and individual domain scores except for the pain domain. There were significantly lower total and individual domain scores in both FGM/C types except for the desire domain compared to control.
Conclusion: In this study, FGM/C was associated with reduced scores of FSFI on all domains scores, and among both types I and II, both were associated with sexual dysfunction.
Keywords: FSFI; Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C); Sexual function.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional review board and ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine Assiut University, before the beginning of the study. All participating women gave written informed consent after a detailed explanation of the study’s aim and methodology was given.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication is available and can be send to the editors on request.
Competing interests
All authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of female genital mutilation/cutting on sexual functions.Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Dec;10:3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 28. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016. PMID: 27938869
-
Effects of female genital mutilation/cutting on the sexual function of Sudanese women: a cross-sectional study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):62.e1-62.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.044. Epub 2017 Mar 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28267442
-
Female genital mutilation/cutting: will it continue?J Sex Med. 2014 Nov;11(11):2756-63. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12655. Epub 2014 Aug 14. J Sex Med. 2014. PMID: 25123710
-
Reasons for and Experiences With Surgical Interventions for Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): A Systematic Review.J Sex Med. 2017 Aug;14(8):977-990. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 27. J Sex Med. 2017. PMID: 28666656 Review.
-
Sexual counselling for treating or preventing sexual dysfunction in women living with female genital mutilation: A systematic review.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;136 Suppl 1:38-42. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12049. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017. PMID: 28164297 Review.
Cited by
-
The comparison of sexual function in types I and II of female genital mutilation.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02860-9. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 38191359 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of sexual dysfunction in pregnancy in a large tertiary hospital in Ghana.PLoS One. 2023 Jul 20;18(7):e0288456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288456. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37471375 Free PMC article.
-
Female Genital Mutilation, Sexual Quality of Life and Marital Relationship: A Case-Control Study From Iran.J Family Reprod Health. 2022 Dec;16(4):264-271. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v16i4.11357. J Family Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 37465431 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative Course of Reconstructive Procedures in FGM Type III-Proposal for a Modified Classification of Type III Female Genital Mutilation.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4439. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054439. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36901456 Free PMC article.
-
Mental and sexual health outcomes associated with FGM/C in Africa: a systematic narrative synthesis.EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jan 10;56:101813. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101813. eCollection 2023 Feb. EClinicalMedicine. 2023. PMID: 36880050 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). Female genital mutilation. Fact sheet No 241, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ Updated February; 2016. Accessed 26 Jan 2017.
-
- Ministry of Health and Population [Egypt], El-Zanaty and associates [Egypt], ICF international. Egypt demographic and health survey 2014. , Maryland: Ministry of Health and Population and ICF International; 2015. Cairo, Egypt and Rockville.
-
- Mahmoud MIH. Effect of female genital mutilation on female sexual function, Alexandria. Egypt Alexandria J Med. 2016;52:1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajme.2014.11.002. - DOI
-
- UNICEF . Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical exploration. New York: UNICEF; 2005.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
