Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;27(2):77-92.
doi: 10.1007/s10728-017-0346-6.

Principles of Need and the Aggregation Thesis

Affiliations
Free article

Principles of Need and the Aggregation Thesis

Erik Gustavsson et al. Health Care Anal. .
Free article

Abstract

Principles of need are constantly referred to in health care priority setting. The common denominator for any principle of need is that it will ascribe some kind of special normative weight to people being worse off. However, this common ground does not answer the question how a plausible principle of need should relate to the aggregation of benefits across individuals. Principles of need are sometimes stated as being incompatible with aggregation and sometimes characterized as accepting aggregation in much the same way as utilitarians do. In this paper we argue that if one wants to take principles of need seriously both of these positions have unreasonable implications. We then characterize and defend a principle of need consisting of sufficientarian elements as well as prioritarian which avoids these unreasonable implications.

Keywords: Aggregation; Needs; Principles of need; Prioritarianism; Priority setting; Sufficiency.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 articles

References

    1. Health Policy. 1993 Aug;24(3):227-38 - PubMed
    1. Philos Public Aff. 1977 Summer;6(4):293-316 - PubMed
    1. Health Econ. 2006 Apr;15(4):393-402 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Philos. 2006;23(2):145-56 - PubMed
    1. Int J Equity Health. 2008 Jan 21;7:4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback