Vision Screening in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- PMID: 28873168
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11260
Vision Screening in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Abstract
Importance: One of the most important causes of vision abnormalities in children is amblyopia (also known as "lazy eye"). Amblyopia is an alteration in the visual neural pathway in a child's developing brain that can lead to permanent vision loss in the affected eye. Among children younger than 6 years, 1% to 6% have amblyopia or its risk factors (strabismus, anisometropia, or both). Early identification of vision abnormalities could prevent the development of amblyopia.
Subpopulation considerations: Studies show that screening rates among children vary by race/ethnicity and family income. Data based on parent reports from 2009-2010 indicated identical screening rates among black non-Hispanic children and white non-Hispanic children (80.7%); however, Hispanic children were less likely than non-Hispanic children to report vision screening (69.8%). Children whose families earned 200% or more above the federal poverty level were more likely to report vision screening than families with lower incomes.
Objective: To update the 2011 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for amblyopia and its risk factors in children.
Evidence review: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy of vision screening tests and the benefits and harms of vision screening and treatment. Surgical interventions were considered to be out of scope for this review.
Findings: Treatment of amblyopia is associated with moderate improvements in visual acuity in children aged 3 to 5 years, which are likely to result in permanent improvements in vision throughout life. The USPSTF concluded that the benefits are moderate because untreated amblyopia results in permanent, uncorrectable vision loss, and the benefits of screening and treatment potentially can be experienced over a child's lifetime. The USPSTF found adequate evidence to bound the potential harms of treatment (ie, higher false-positive rates in low-prevalence populations) as small. Therefore, the USPSTF concluded with moderate certainty that the overall net benefit is moderate for children aged 3 to 5 years.
Conclusions and recommendations: The USPSTF recommends vision screening at least once in all children aged 3 to 5 years to detect amblyopia or its risk factors. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vision screening in children younger than 3 years. (I statement).
Summary for patients in
-
Vision Screening in Children.JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):878. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11386. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28873163 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Vision Screening in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):845-858. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9900. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28873167 Review.
-
Screening and Interventions to Prevent Dental Caries in Children Younger Than 5 Years: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2172-2178. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20007. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34874412
-
Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update.J AAPOS. 2013 Feb;17(1):4-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.012. Epub 2013 Jan 27. J AAPOS. 2013. PMID: 23360915
-
Screening for Obesity in Children and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2417-2426. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6803. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28632874
-
Statin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2022 Aug 23;328(8):746-753. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13044. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35997723 Review.
Cited by
-
Automated screening devices for vision screening in preschool children: A comparison of the PlusoptiX S12C photoscreener and retinomax K+3 autorefractor.Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 22;2:1049622. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2022.1049622. eCollection 2022. Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 38983509 Free PMC article.
-
UCI EyeMobile Exam Findings from School Children Following on-Site Screening.Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 6;18:1667-1678. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S460879. eCollection 2024. Clin Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38860118 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a Novel Pediatric Eye Chart Assessing Visual Acuity by Minimum Separable Threshold.Children (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;11(4):397. doi: 10.3390/children11040397. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38671614 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical profile of amblyopia in a tertiary care facility without proper vision screening in Saudi Arabia.Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 26;38(1):78-82. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_87_22. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38628408 Free PMC article.
-
Vision Loss in Children from Immigrant and Nonimmigrant Households: Evidence from the National Survey of Children's Health 2018-2020.J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Oct;26(5):813-822. doi: 10.1007/s10903-024-01597-3. Epub 2024 Apr 6. J Immigr Minor Health. 2024. PMID: 38581597
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
