Association of Guideline Adherence for Serial Evaluations With Survival and Adverse Clinical Events in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
- PMID: 28877303
- PMCID: PMC5815010
- DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2952
Association of Guideline Adherence for Serial Evaluations With Survival and Adverse Clinical Events in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
Abstract
Importance: For patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular function, current practice guidelines empirically recommend serial evaluations every 6 to 12 months. The benefit of this clinical monitoring is unknown.
Objective: To determine the association of guideline adherence with clinical outcomes in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.
Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study involved 300 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis who were seen in the ambulatory Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital. Rates of survival and adverse clinical events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization, were compared between patients who adhered to serial evaluation guidance and those who did not. Medical records were reviewed from July 25, 2007, to December 6, 2012. Data analysis took place from February 4, 2017, to July 10, 2017.
Main outcomes and measures: All-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and major adverse clinical events during follow-up.
Results: The study population of 300 comprised 143 men (47.7%) and had a mean (SD) age of 78.6 (11.5) years. There were no differences in age, race/ethnicity, sex, comorbidities, insurance status, left ventricular function, and aortic stenosis severity between patients with (n = 202) and patients without (n = 98) guideline adherence. Aortic valve replacement (surgical or catheter based) was performed more frequently (54.0% vs 19.4%; P < .001) and the median (interquartile range) time for this performance was earlier (2.2 [1.2-3.6] years vs 3.5 [2.0-5.8] years; P < .001) in patients with guideline adherence. All-cause mortality was higher for nonadherent patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.07-2.30; P < .001), and these patients also had a higher rate of hospital admission for heart failure decompensation in follow-up (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.27-2.18; P < .001). Four-year survival that is free from death and heart failure hospitalization was higher for adherent patients than for nonadherent patients (38.7% vs 23.3%; P < .001), and this difference remained significant in models adjusted for baseline variables (adjusted HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.04-2.29; P = .03).
Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this study support the need for close monitoring of patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis and help to validate current guidelines for serial evaluations. These findings also support initiatives to improve guideline adherence in clinical practice.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of Patients With Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Followed Up in Heart Valve Clinics.JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;3(11):1060-1068. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3152. JAMA Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30285058 Free PMC article.
-
Relation of Guideline Adherence to Outcomes in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation.Am J Cardiol. 2021 Sep 15;155:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.054. Epub 2021 Jul 26. Am J Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34325105
-
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Aortic Stenosis.Dan Med J. 2017 May;64(5):B5352. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28552098
-
Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Single Technology Assessment of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. PMID: 29553663 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
[Echocardiography in aortic stenosis: new insights into challenging scenarios].Ital Heart J Suppl. 2004 Jun;5(6):457-65. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2004. PMID: 15471150 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Natural history of initially asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a one-stage meta-analysis.Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02465-8. Online ahead of print. Clin Res Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 39009912
-
Impact of Managing Provider Type on Severe Aortic Stenosis Management and Mortality.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):e025164. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025164. Epub 2022 Jun 29. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35766279 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitated Data Relay and Effects on Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis in Europe.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e013160. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013160. Epub 2019 Sep 24. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31549578 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pellikka PA, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(5):1012-1017. - PubMed
-
- Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. . Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(9):611-617. - PubMed
-
- Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M, et al. . Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121(1):151-156. - PubMed
-
- Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. ; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines . 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(22):e57-e185. - PubMed
-
- Wang A, Grayburn P, Foster JA, et al. . Practice gaps in the care of mitral valve regurgitation: insights from the American College of Cardiology mitral regurgitation gap analysis and advisory panel. Am Heart J. 2016;172:70-79. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
