Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 7;5(3):e28.
doi: 10.2196/medinform.7476.

Health Information Technology (HIT) Adaptation: Refocusing on the Journey to Successful HIT Implementation

Affiliations

Health Information Technology (HIT) Adaptation: Refocusing on the Journey to Successful HIT Implementation

Po-Yin Yen et al. JMIR Med Inform. .

Abstract

In past years, policies and regulations required hospitals to implement advanced capabilities of certified electronic health records (EHRs) in order to receive financial incentives. This has led to accelerated implementation of health information technologies (HIT) in health care settings. However, measures commonly used to evaluate the success of HIT implementation, such as HIT adoption, technology acceptance, and clinical quality, fail to account for complex sociotechnical variability across contexts and the different trajectories within organizations because of different implementation plans and timelines. We propose a new focus, HIT adaptation, to illuminate factors that facilitate or hinder the connection between use of the EHR and improved quality of care as well as to explore the trajectory of changes in the HIT implementation journey as it is impacted by frequent system upgrades and optimizations. Future research should develop instruments to evaluate the progress of HIT adaptation in both its longitudinal design and its focus on adaptation progress rather than on one cross-sectional outcome, allowing for more generalizability and knowledge transfer.

Keywords: acceptance; adaptation; adoption; health information technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Health information technology adaptation measures as the process evaluation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adapted from the sociotechnical model [43].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thompson T, Brailer D. Health IT Strategic Framework. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2004.
    1. Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches C, Furukawa M, Worzala C, Charles D, Kralovec P. More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014 - PubMed
    1. DesRoches CM, Charles D, Furukawa MF, Joshi MS, Kralovec P, Mostashari F, Worzala C, Jha AK. Adoption of electronic health records grows rapidly, but fewer than half of US hospitals had at least a basic system in 2012. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013 Aug;32(8):1478–1485. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0308. http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=23840052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Electronic health records (EHR) incentive programs 2017. [2017-08-18]. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePro... 6sp1G1AHt.
    1. DeSalvo KB, Salavitt A. Moving toward improved care through information. 2016. [2017-08-18]. https://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/from-the-onc-desk/moving-improved-car... 6sp1KbyVJ

LinkOut - more resources