Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 6 (9)

Variation in Management of Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment and Reporting Tool (VA CART) Program


Variation in Management of Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment and Reporting Tool (VA CART) Program

Amneet Sandhu et al. J Am Heart Assoc.


Background: Little is known about facility-level variation in the use of revascularization procedures for the management of stable obstructive coronary artery disease. Furthermore, it is unknown if variation in the use of coronary revascularization is associated with use of other cardiovascular procedures.

Methods and results: We evaluated all elective coronary angiograms performed in the Veterans Affairs system between September 1, 2007, and December 31, 2011, using the Clinical Assessment and Reporting Tool and identified patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Patients were considered managed with revascularization if they received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days of diagnosis. We calculated risk-adjusted facility-level rates of overall revascularization, PCI, and coronary artery bypass grafting. In addition, we determined the association between facility-level rates of revascularization and post-PCI stress testing. Among 15 650 patients at 51 Veterans Affairs sites who met inclusion criteria, the median rate of revascularization was 59.6% (interquartile range, 55.7%-66.7%). Across all facilities, risk-adjusted rates of overall revascularization varied from 41.5% to 88.1%, rate of PCI varied from 23.2% to 80.6%, and rate of coronary artery bypass graftingvariedfrom 7.5% to 36.5%. Of 6179 patients who underwent elective PCI, the median rate of stress testing in the 2 years after PCI was 33.7% (interquartile range, 30.7%-47.1%). There was no evidence of correlation between facility-level rate of revascularization and follow-up stress testing.

Conclusions: Within the Veterans Affairs system, we observed large facility-level variation in rates of revascularization for obstructive coronary artery disease, with variation driven primarily by PCI. There was no association between facility-level use of revascularization and follow-up stress testing, suggesting use rates are specific to a particular procedure and not a marker of overall facility-level use.

Keywords: coronary artery bypass graft surgery; coronary artery disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; rate; variation.


Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort design showing inclusion and exclusion criteria. CAD indicates coronary artery disease; CART, Clinical Assessment and Reporting Tool; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and VA, Veterans Affairs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A, Total risk‐adjusted rate of revascularization of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) across all hospitals. B, Risk‐adjusted rate of revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk‐adjusted rate of revascularization compared with 2‐year post–percutaneous coronary intervention stress testing rate by hospital.

Similar articles

See all similar articles


    1. Hassan A, Newman A, Ko DT, Rinfret S, Hirsch G, Ghali WA, Tu JV. Increasing rates of angioplasty versus bypass surgery in Canada, 1994–2005. Am Heart J. 2010;160:958–965. - PubMed
    1. Ko DT, Tu JV, Samadashvili Z, Guo H, Alter DA, Cantor WJ, Hannan EL. Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State and Ontario. Circulation. 2010;121:2635–2644. - PubMed
    1. Hannan EL, Wu C, Chassin MR. Differences in per capita rates of revascularization and in choice of revascularization procedure for eleven states. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maddox TM, Plomondon ME, Petrich M, Tsai TT, Gethoffer H, Noonan G, Gillespie B, Box T, Fihn SD, Jesse RL, Rumsfeld JS. A national clinical quality program for Veterans Affairs catheterization laboratories (from the Veterans Affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking program). Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:1750–1757. - PubMed
    1. Byrd JB, Vigen R, Plomondon ME, Rumsfeld JS, Box TL, Fihn SD, Maddox TM. Data quality of an electronic health record tool to support VA cardiac catheterization laboratory quality improvement: the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System for Cath Labs (CART) program. Am Heart J. 2013;165:434–440. - PubMed

MeSH terms