A Randomized Study Comparing the Sniffing Position with Simple Head Extension for Glottis Visualization and Difficulty in Intubation during Direct Laryngoscopy

Mehmooda Akhtar; Zulfiqar Ali; Nelofar Hassan; Saqib Mehdi; Gh Mohammad Wani; Aabid Hussain Mir

doi:10.4103/0259-1162.204206

A Randomized Study Comparing the Sniffing Position with Simple Head Extension for Glottis Visualization and Difficulty in Intubation during Direct Laryngoscopy

Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):762-766. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.204206.

Authors

Mehmooda Akhtar¹, Zulfiqar Ali², Nelofar Hassan³, Saqib Mehdi⁴, Gh Mohammad Wani⁵, Aabid Hussain Mir¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
² Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Neuroanaesthesiology Division, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
³ Department of General Medicine, Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
⁴ Department of General Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
⁵ Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Abstract

Background: Proper positioning of the head and neck is important for an optimal laryngeal visualization. Traditionally, sniffing position (SP) is recommended to provide a superior glottic visualization, during direct laryngoscopy, enhancing the ease of intubation. Various studies in the last decade of this belief have challenged the need for sniffing position during intubation. We conducted a prospective study comparing the sniffing head position with simple head extension to study the laryngoscopic view and intubation difficulty during direct laryngoscopy.

Materials and methods: Five-hundred patients were included in this study and randomly distributed to SP or simple head extension. In the sniffing group, an incompressible head ring was placed under the head to raise its height by 7 cm from the neutral plane followed by maximal extension of the head. In the simple extension group, no headrest was placed under the head; however, maximal head extension was given at the time of laryngoscopy. Various factors as ability to mask ventilate, laryngoscopic visualization, intubation difficulty, and posture of the anesthesiologist during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were noted. In the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack Grade III and IV), Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS score) was compared between the two groups.

Results: There was no significant difference between two groups in Cormack grades. The IDS score differed significantly between sniffing group and simple extension group (P = 0.000) with an increased difficulty during intubation in the simple head extension. Patients with simple head extension needed more lifting force, increased use of external laryngeal manipulation, and an increased use of alternate techniques during intubation when compared to SP.

Conclusion: We conclude that compared to the simple head extension position, the SP should be used as a standard head position for intubation attempts under general anesthesia.

Keywords: Glottis visualization; intubation; laryngoscopy; simple head extension; sniffing position.