Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers
- PMID: 28933000
- PMCID: PMC5999171
- DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-0039-1
Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers
Abstract
Until recently, no prediction models for Lynch syndrome (LS) had been validated for PMS2 mutation carriers. We aimed to evaluate MMRpredict and PREMM5 in a clinical cohort and for PMS2 mutation carriers specifically. In a retrospective, clinic-based cohort we calculated predictions for LS according to MMRpredict and PREMM5. The area under the operator receiving characteristic curve (AUC) was compared between MMRpredict and PREMM5 for LS patients in general and for different LS genes specifically. Of 734 index patients, 83 (11%) were diagnosed with LS; 23 MLH1, 17 MSH2, 31 MSH6 and 12 PMS2 mutation carriers. Both prediction models performed well for MLH1 and MSH2 (AUC 0.80 and 0.83 for PREMM5 and 0.79 for MMRpredict) and fair for MSH6 mutation carriers (0.69 for PREMM5 and 0.66 for MMRpredict). MMRpredict performed fair for PMS2 mutation carriers (AUC 0.72), while PREMM5 failed to discriminate PMS2 mutation carriers from non-mutation carriers (AUC 0.51). The only statistically significant difference between PMS2 mutation carriers and non-mutation carriers was proximal location of colorectal cancer (77 vs. 28%, p < 0.001). Adding location of colorectal cancer to PREMM5 considerably improved the models performance for PMS2 mutation carriers (AUC 0.77) and overall (AUC 0.81 vs. 0.72). We validated these results in an external cohort of 376 colorectal cancer patients, including 158 LS patients. MMRpredict and PREMM5 cannot adequately identify PMS2 mutation carriers. Adding location of colorectal cancer to PREMM5 may improve the performance of this model, which should be validated in larger cohorts.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Hereditary cancer; Lynch syndrome; Prediction models.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors declare a conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Commentary: PREMM5 threshold of 2.5% is recommended to improve identification of PMS2 carriers.Fam Cancer. 2018 Oct;17(4):567. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0074-6. Fam Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29380099 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Development and Validation of the PREMM5 Model for Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Lynch Syndrome.J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2165-2172. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.6120. Epub 2017 May 10. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28489507 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of Lynch syndrome in consecutive patients with colorectal cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 4;101(5):331-40. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn499. Epub 2009 Feb 24. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19244167
-
Performance evaluation of predictive models for detecting MMR gene mutations associated with Lynch syndrome in cancer patients in a Chinese cohort in Taiwan.Int J Cancer. 2024 Dec 15;155(12):2201-2210. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35106. Epub 2024 Jul 20. Int J Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39032036
-
Criteria and prediction models for mismatch repair gene mutations: a review.J Med Genet. 2013 Dec;50(12):785-93. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101803. Epub 2013 Aug 16. J Med Genet. 2013. PMID: 23956446 Review.
-
Update on Lynch syndrome genomics.Fam Cancer. 2016 Jul;15(3):385-93. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9882-8. Fam Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26873718 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Use and feasibility of a Lynch Syndrome predictive model for inherited colorectal and endometrial cancer in a low-middle income country.Fam Cancer. 2024 Nov;23(4):563-567. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00422-y. Epub 2024 Sep 24. Fam Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39317871
-
The Diagnostic Yield and Implications of Targeted Founder Pathogenic Variant Testing in an Israeli Cohort.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 24;16(1):94. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010094. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38201524 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of Utilizing PREMM Score for Lynch Syndrome Identification in an Urban, Minority Patient Population.J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211020973. doi: 10.1177/21501327211020973. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021. PMID: 34053368 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of a Systematic Tumor Screening Program for Lynch Syndrome in an Integrated Health Care Setting.Fam Cancer. 2019 Jul;18(3):317-325. doi: 10.1007/s10689-019-00123-x. Fam Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30729418 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Commentary: PREMM5 threshold of 2.5% is recommended to improve identification of PMS2 carriers.Fam Cancer. 2018 Oct;17(4):567. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0074-6. Fam Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29380099 No abstract available.
References
-
- Jarvinen HJ, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Aktan-Collan K, Peltomaki P, Aaltonen LA, Mecklin JP. Ten years after mutation testing for Lynch syndrome: cancer incidence and outcome in mutation-positive and mutation-negative family members. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4793–4797. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7784. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
