Purpose To evaluate the clinical performance of dual-agent relaxation contrast (DARC) magnetic resonance (MR) lymphangiography compared with that of conventional MR lymphangiography in the creation of isolated lymphatic maps in patients with secondary lymphedema. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. The diagnostic quality of 42 DARC MR lymphangiographic studies was compared with that of 42 conventional MR lymphangiographic studies. Two independent readers rated venous contamination as absent, mild, or moderate to severe. Interreader agreement on venous contamination grades was assessed by using the linearly weighted Cohen κ statistic. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the distribution of grades at each station between conventional MR lymphangiography and DARC MR lymphangiography for each reader separately. Results DARC MR lymphangiography had significantly less venous contamination than did conventional MR lymphangiography (P < .001). The two radiologists rated venous contamination as moderate to severe in 64% (27 of 42) and 69% (29 of 42) of distal limbs, 23% (10 of 42) of midlimbs, and 2% (one of 42) and 9% (four of 42) of proximal limbs at conventional MR lymphangiography compared with 0% (0 of 42) of distal limbs, 2% (one of 42) of midlimbs, and 0% (0 of 42) of proximal limbs at DARC MR lymphangiography. Lymphatic signal was partially attenuated (median 45% decrease) when longer echo times were used for venous suppression, but it did not subjectively degrade diagnostic quality. Conclusion DARC MR lymphangiography yields isolated lymphatic maps through nulling of venous contamination, thereby simplifying diagnostic interpretation and communication with surgical colleagues. © RSNA, 2017.