Socioeconomic inequality of access to healthcare: Does choice explain the gradient?

J Health Econ. 2018 Jan:57:290-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Abstract

Equity of access is a key policy objective in publicly-funded healthcare systems. However, observed inequalities of access by socioeconomic status may result from differences in patients' choices. Using data on non-emergency coronary revascularisation procedures in the English National Health Service, we found substantive differences in waiting times within public hospitals between patients with different socioeconomic status: up to 35% difference, or 43 days, between the most and least deprived population quintile groups. Using selection models with differential distances as identification variables, we estimated that only up to 12% of these waiting time inequalities can be attributed to patients' choices of hospital and type of treatment (heart bypass versus stent). Residual inequality, after allowing for choice, was economically significant: patients in the least deprived quintile group benefited from shorter waiting times and the associated health benefits were worth up to £850 per person.

Keywords: Choice; Inequalities; Selection bias; Socioeconomic status; Waiting times.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Choice Behavior*
  • Databases, Factual
  • England
  • Female
  • Health Services Accessibility / economics*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Social Class*
  • Socioeconomic Factors*
  • Waiting Lists