Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug;24(4):1035-1055.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9976-1. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

Ethical Design of Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia: A Descriptive Review

Affiliations
Review

Ethical Design of Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia: A Descriptive Review

Marcello Ienca et al. Sci Eng Ethics. .

Abstract

The use of Intelligent Assistive Technology (IAT) in dementia care opens the prospects of reducing the global burden of dementia and enabling novel opportunities to improve the lives of dementia patients. However, with current adoption rates being reportedly low, the potential of IATs might remain under-expressed as long as the reasons for suboptimal adoption remain unaddressed. Among these, ethical and social considerations are critical. This article reviews the spectrum of IATs for dementia and investigates the prevalence of ethical considerations in the design of current IATs. Our screening shows that a significant portion of current IATs is designed in the absence of explicit ethical considerations. These results suggest that the lack of ethical consideration might be a codeterminant of current structural limitations in the translation of IATs from designing labs to bedside. Based on these data, we call for a coordinated effort to proactively incorporate ethical considerations early in the design and development of new products.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Assistive technology; Dementia; Ethical design; Neurotechnology; Proactive ethics; User-centered.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 10 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Maturitas. 2013 Jan;74(1):14-20 - PubMed
    1. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2004 Sep;8(3):253-7 - PubMed
    1. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007 Mar;15(1):136-43 - PubMed
    1. Gerontology. 2015;61(3):268-80 - PubMed
    1. Neuroethics. 2017;10(2):255-266 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback