Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;43(10):517-523.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

Clinician Perspectives on the Management of Abnormal Subcritical Tests in an Urban Academic Safety-Net Health Care System

Clinician Perspectives on the Management of Abnormal Subcritical Tests in an Urban Academic Safety-Net Health Care System

Cassidy Clarity et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Missed or delayed follow-up of abnormal subcritical tests (tests that do not require immediate medical attention) can lead to poor patient outcomes. Safety-net health systems with limited resources and socially complex patients are vulnerable to safety gaps resulting from delayed management. Clinician perspectives to identify system challenges, vulnerable situations, and potential solutions were sought in focus groups.

Methods: Five semistructured focus groups were conducted in 2015 with purposefully sampled clinicians from radiology, hospital medicine, emergency medicine, risk management, and ambulatory care from an urban, academic, integrated, safety-net health system. Thematic analysis identified challenges of current management of abnormal subcritical tests, vulnerable situations, and solution characteristics. A total of 43 clinicians participated.

Results: Clinicians cited challenges in assigning responsibility for follow-up and identified tests pending at discharge and tests requiring delayed follow-up as vulnerable situations. The lack of tracking systems and missing contact information for patients and providers exacerbated these challenges. Proposed solution characteristics involved protocols to aid in assigning responsibility, reliable paths of communication, and systems to track the status of tests. Clinicians noted a strong desire for integration of the work flow and technology solutions into existing structures.

Conclusion: In an urban safety-net setting, clinicians recommended outlining clear chains of responsibility and communication in the management of subcritical test results, and employing simple, integrated technological solutions that allow for tracking and management of tests. Existing test management solutions should be adapted to work within safety-net systems, which often have fewer resources and more complex patients and may function in the absence of integrated technology systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Proposed solutions for managing abnormal subcritical tests using an adapted SEIPS model

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gandhi TK Fumbled handoffs: one dropped ball after another, Ann Intern Med. 2005, 142, 352–358. - PubMed
    1. Gandhi TK; Kachalia A; Thomas EJ, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims, Ann Intern Med. 2006, 145, 488–496. - PubMed
    1. Giardina TD; King BJ; Ignaczak AP, et al. Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients, Health Aff (Millwood). 2013, 32, 1368–1375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore C SO, Trikha A, Lin J Timely follow-up of abnormal outpatient test results: Perceived barriers and impact on patient safety, Journal of Patient Safety. 2008, 4, 241–244.
    1. Callen JL; Westbrook JI; Georgiou A; Li J. Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review, J Gen Intern Med. 2012, 27, 1334–1348. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms