Whereas the last Century of science was characterized by epistemological uncertainty; the current Century will likely be characterized by ontological complexity (Gorban and Yablonsky, 2013). Advances in Systems Theory by mathematical biologist Robert Rosen suggest an elegant way forward (Rosen, 2013). "R-theory" (Kineman, 2012) is a synthesis of Rosen's theories explaining complexity and life in terms of a meta-model for 'whole' systems (and their fractions) in terms of "5th-order holons". Such holons are Rosen "modeling relations" relating system-dependent processes with their formative contexts via closed cycles of four archetypal (Aristotelian) causes. This approach has post-predicted the three most basic taxa of life, plus a quasi-organismic form that may describe proto, component, and ecosystemic life. R-theory thus suggests a fundamentally complex ontology of existence inverting the current view that complexity arises from simple mechanisms. This model of cyclical causality corresponds to the ancient meta-model described in the Vedas and Upanishads of India. Part I of this discussion (Kineman, 2016a) presented a case for associating Vedic philosophy with Harappan civilization, allowing interpretation of ancient concepts of "cosmic order" (Rta) in the Rig Veda, nonduality (advaita), seven-fold beingness (saptanna) and other forms of holism appearing later in the Upanishads. By deciphering the model of wholeness that was applied and tested in ancient times, it is possible to compare, test, and confirm the holon model as a mathematical definition of life, systemic wholeness, and sustainability that may be applied today in modern terms, even as a foundation for holistic science.
Keywords: Holism; Holon; R-theory; Relational biology; Vedic non-duality; Whole systems.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.