Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;31(12):10.1111/ctr.13125.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.13125. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

What patients and members of their support networks ask about transplant program data

Affiliations

What patients and members of their support networks ask about transplant program data

Cory R Schaffhausen et al. Clin Transplant. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Transplant patients often seek specific data and statistics to inform medical decision making; however, for many relevant measures, patient-friendly information is not available. Development of patient-centered resources should be informed by patient needs. This study used qualitative document research methods to review 678 detailed Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) entries and summary counts of 55 362 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) entries to provide a better understanding of what was asked and what requests were most common. Incoming call and email logs maintained by SRTR and UNOS were reviewed for 2010-2015. Patients sought a wide range of information about outcomes, waiting times, program volumes, and willingness to perform transplants in candidates with specific diseases or demographics. Patients and members of their support networks requested explanation of complex information, such as actual-vs-expected outcomes, and of general transplant processes, such as registering on the waiting list or becoming a living donor. They sought transplant program data from SRTR and UNOS, but encountered gaps in the information they wanted and occasionally struggled to interpret some data. These findings were used to identify potential gaps in providing program-specific data and to enhance the SRTR website (www.srtr.org) with more patient-friendly information.

Keywords: patient-centered information; qualitative document research; transplant program data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tong A, Hanson CS, Chapman JR, Halleck F, Budde K, Josephson MA, et al. ‘Suspended in a paradox’-patient attitudes to wait-listing for kidney transplantation: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Transpl Int. 2015;28:771–787. - PubMed
    1. Gordon EJ. Patients’ decisions for treatment of end-stage renal disease and their implications for access to transplantation. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53:971–987. - PubMed
    1. Klassen AC, Hall AG, Saksvig B, Curbow B, Klassen DK. Relationship between patients' perceptions of disadvantage and discrimination and listing for kidney transplantation. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:811. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Humphreys SL. Shifting Life's Focus: African American dialysis patients' experiences with kidney transplant evaluation [dissertation] Fairfax: George Mason University; 2011.
    1. Calestani M, Tonkin-Crine S, Pruthi R, Leydon G, Ravanan R, Bradley JA, et al. Patient attitudes towards kidney transplant listing: qualitative findings from the ATTOM study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:2144–2150. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms