Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 25;12(9):e0185243.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185243. eCollection 2017.

Directional preference in dogs: Laterality and "pull of the north"

Affiliations

Directional preference in dogs: Laterality and "pull of the north"

Jana Adámková et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Laterality is a well described phenomenon in domestic dogs. It was shown that dogs, under calm Earth's magnetic field conditions, when marking their home ranges, tend to head about north- or southwards and display thus magnetic alignment. The question arises whether magnetic alignment might be affected or even compromised by laterality and vice versa. We tested the preference of dogs to choose between two dishes with snacks that were placed left and right, in different compass directions (north and east, east and south, south and west or west and north) in front of them. Some dogs were right-lateral, some left-lateral but most of them were ambilateral. There was a preference for the dish placed north compared to the one placed east of the dog ("pull of the north"). This effect was highly significant in small and medium-sized breeds but not in larger breeds, highly significant in females, in older dogs, in lateralized dogs but less significant or not significant in males, younger dogs, or ambilateral dogs. Laterality and "pull of the north" are phenomena which should be considered in diverse tasks and behavioral tests with which dogs or other animals might be confronted. The interaction and possible conflict between lateralization and "pull of the north" might be also considered as a reason for shifted magnetic alignment observed in different animal species in different contexts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Photo illustrating the study setup.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Mean preference for compass direction of a dish with snacks of the first choice.
Angular means over dogs of small, medium-sized, and large breeds. The arrow indicates the grand mean axial vector (μ) calculated over all angular means. The length of the mean vector (r) provides a measure of the degree of clustering in the distribution of the mean vectors. The inner circle marks the 0.05 level of significance border of the Rayleigh test. See Table 2 for statistics.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Mean preference for compass direction of a dish with snacks of the first choice.
Angular means over males and females separately. The arrow indicates the grand mean axial vector (μ) calculated over all angular means. The length of the mean vector (r) provides a measure of the degree of clustering in the distribution of the mean vectors. The inner circle marks the 0.05 level of significance border of the Rayleigh test. See Table 2 for statistics.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Mean preference for compass direction of a dish with snacks of the first choice.
Angular means over dogs of different lateralization types. The arrow indicates the grand mean axial vector (μ) calculated over all angular means. The length of the mean vector (r) provides a measure of the degree of clustering in the distribution of the mean vectors. The inner circle marks the 0.05 level of significance border of the Rayleigh test. See Table 2 for statistics.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Mean preference for compass direction of a dish with snacks of the first choice.
Angular means over dogs of different age categories. The arrow indicates the grand mean axial vector (μ) calculated over all angular means. The length of the mean vector (r) provides a measure of the degree of clustering in the distribution of the mean vectors. The inner circle marks the 0.05 level of significance border of the Rayleigh test. See Table 2 for statistics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rogers LJ. Laterality in animals. Internat J Comp Psychol. 1989;3:5–25.
    1. Rogers LJ. Lateralization in vertebrates: its early evolution, general pattern, and development. Adv Study Behav. 2002;31:107–161.
    1. Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G, Andrew R.J. Divided brains. The Biology and Behaviour of Brain Asymmetries. 2013;Cambridge University Press, New York.
    1. Schaafsma SM, Riedstra BJ, Pfannkuche KA, Bouma A, Groothuis TG. Epigenesis of behavioural lateralization in humans and other animals. Phil Trans Roy Soc B. 2009;364:915–927. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warren JM. Handedness and laterality in humans and other animals. Physiol. 1980;8:351–359.

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Project No. 15-21840S); the Grant Agency of the Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, CIGA (Project No. 20174319), and the Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, IGA (Project No. B07/16). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources