Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 3 (9), eaao1390
eCollection

Intersectionality Takes It to the Streets: Mobilizing Across Diverse Interests for the Women's March

Affiliations

Intersectionality Takes It to the Streets: Mobilizing Across Diverse Interests for the Women's March

Dana R Fisher et al. Sci Adv.

Abstract

Can a diverse crowd of individuals whose interests focus on distinct issues related to racial identity, class, gender, and sexuality mobilize around a shared issue? If so, how does this process work in practice? To date, limited research has explored intersectionality as a mobilization tool for social movements. This paper unpacks how intersectionality influences the constituencies represented in one of the largest protests ever observed in the United States: the Women's March on Washington in January 2017. Analyzing a data set collected from a random sample of participants, we explore how social identities influenced participation in the Women's March. Our analysis demonstrates how individuals' motivations to participate represented an intersectional set of issues and how coalitions of issues emerge. We conclude by discussing how these coalitions enable us to understand and predict the future of the anti-Trump resistance.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Gould R. V., Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56, 716–729 (1991).
    1. Klandermans B., Oegema D., Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. Am. Sociol. Rev. 52, 519–531 (1987).
    1. Z. W. Munson, The Making of Pro-life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works (University of Chicago Press, 2010).
    1. Oegema D., Klandermans B., Why social movement sympathizers don’t participate: Erosion and nonconversion of support. Am. Sociol. Rev. 59, 703–722 (1994).
    1. Beamish T. D., Luebbers A. J., Alliance building across social movements: Bridging difference in a peace and justice coalition. Soc. Probl. 56, 647–676 (2009).

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback