Numerical assessment and comparison of pulse wave velocity methods aiming at measuring aortic stiffness
- PMID: 28968226
- DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa905a
Numerical assessment and comparison of pulse wave velocity methods aiming at measuring aortic stiffness
Abstract
Pulse waveform analyses have become established components of cardiovascular research. Recently several methods have been proposed as tools to measure aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV). The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV), the current clinical gold standard method for the noninvasive assessment of aPWV, uses the carotid-to-femoral pulse transit time difference (cf-PTT) and an estimated path length to derive cf-PWV.
Objective: The heart-ankle PWV (ha-PWV), brachial-ankle PWV (ba-PWV) and finger-toe (ft-PWV) are also methods presuming to approximate aPWV based on time delays between physiological cardiovascular signals at two locations (~heart-ankle PTT, ha-PTT; ~brachial-ankle PTT, ba-PTT; ~finger-toe PTT, ft-PTT) and a path length typically derived from the subject's height. To test the validity of these methods, we used a detailed 1D arterial network model (143 arterial segments) including the foot and hand circulation.
Approach: The arterial tree dimensions and properties were taken from the literature and completed with data from patient scans. We calculated PTTs with all the methods mentioned above. The calculated PTTs were compared with the aortic PTT (aPTT), which is considered as the absolute reference method in this study.
Main results: The correlation between methods and aPTT was good and significant, cf-PTT (R 2 = 0.97; P < 0.001; mean difference 5 ± 2 ms), ha-PTT (R 2 = 0.96; P < 0.001; 150 ± 23 ms), ba-PTT (R 2 = 0.96; P < 0.001; 70 ± 13 ms) and ft-PTT (R 2 = 0.95; P < 0.001; 14 ± 10 ms). Consequently, good correlation was also observed for the PWV values derived with the tested methods, but absolute values differed because of the different path lengths used.
Significance: In conclusion, our computer model-based analyses demonstrate that for PWV methods based on peripheral signals, pulse transit time differences closely correlate with the aortic transit time, supporting the use of these methods in clinical practice.
Comment in
-
Comment on 'Numerical assessment and comparison of pulse wave velocity methods aiming at measuring aortic stiffness'.Physiol Meas. 2018 Jul 6;39(7):078001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aaca80. Physiol Meas. 2018. PMID: 29869992 Free PMC article.
-
Reply to Comment on 'Numerical assessment and comparison of pulse wave velocity methods aiming at measuring aortic stiffness'.Physiol Meas. 2018 Jul 6;39(7):078002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aaca7f. Physiol Meas. 2018. PMID: 29869993 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of arterial stiffness by finger-toe pulse wave velocity: optimization of signal processing and clinical validation.J Hypertens. 2017 Aug;35(8):1618-1625. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001371. J Hypertens. 2017. PMID: 28379892
-
A novel device for measuring arterial stiffness using finger-toe pulse wave velocity: Validation study of the pOpmètre®.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Apr;108(4):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015. PMID: 25682547
-
Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as a screen for arterial stiffness: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.Yonsei Med J. 2015 May;56(3):617-24. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.617. Yonsei Med J. 2015. PMID: 25837165 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature studies.Ann Med. 2015;47(6):457-67. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2015.1068950. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Ann Med. 2015. PMID: 26340234 Review.
-
[Pulse wave velocity - a useful tool in assessing the stiffness of the arteries].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2019 Jun 28;46(276):257-262. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2019. PMID: 31260435 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Clustered photoplethysmogram pulse wave shapes and their associations with clinical data.Front Physiol. 2023 Oct 26;14:1176753. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1176753. eCollection 2023. Front Physiol. 2023. PMID: 37954447 Free PMC article.
-
Noninvasive hemodynamic indices of vascular aging: an in silico assessment.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023 Dec 1;325(6):H1290-H1303. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00454.2023. Epub 2023 Sep 22. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023. PMID: 37737734 Free PMC article.
-
Association between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus.BMC Endocr Disord. 2023 May 4;23(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01355-w. BMC Endocr Disord. 2023. PMID: 37143027 Free PMC article.
-
Arterial pulse wave modeling and analysis for vascular-age studies: a review from VascAgeNet.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023 Jul 1;325(1):H1-H29. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00705.2022. Epub 2023 Mar 31. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023. PMID: 37000606 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cerebral blood flow pulsatility and cerebral artery stiffness acutely decrease during hemodialysis.Physiol Rep. 2023 Feb;11(4):e15595. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15595. Physiol Rep. 2023. PMID: 36808481 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources