Using synthetic biology to study gene regulatory evolution
- PMID: 28968519
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2017.09.001
Using synthetic biology to study gene regulatory evolution
Abstract
Transcriptional enhancers specify the precise time, level, and location of gene expression. Disentangling and characterizing the components of enhancer activity in multicellular eukaryotic development has proven challenging because enhancers contain activator and repressor binding sites for multiple factors that each exert nuanced, context-dependent control of enhancer activity. Recent advances in synthetic biology provide an almost unlimited ability to create and modify regulatory elements and networks, offering unprecedented power to study gene regulation. Here we review several studies demonstrating the utility of synthetic biology for studying enhancer function during development and evolution. These studies clearly show that synthetic biology can provide a way to reverse-engineer and reengineer transcriptional regulation in animal genomes with enormous potential for understanding evolution.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Cis-regulatory landscapes in development and evolution.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2017 Apr;43:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 11. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2017. PMID: 27842294 Review.
-
A Fully Synthetic Transcriptional Platform for a Multicellular Eukaryote.Cell Rep. 2017 Jan 3;18(1):287-296. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.025. Cell Rep. 2017. PMID: 28052257
-
Towards synthetic gene circuits with enhancers: biology's multi-input integrators.Subcell Biochem. 2012;64:3-20. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5055-5_1. Subcell Biochem. 2012. PMID: 23080243 Review.
-
The appeasement of Doug: a synthetic approach to enhancer biology.Integr Biol (Camb). 2016 Apr 18;8(4):475-84. doi: 10.1039/c5ib00321k. Epub 2016 Mar 3. Integr Biol (Camb). 2016. PMID: 26936291 Review.
-
Evolution of developmental genes: molecular microevolution of enhancer sequences at the Ubx locus in Drosophila and its impact on developmental phenotypes.Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Feb;21(2):348-63. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh025. Epub 2003 Dec 5. Mol Biol Evol. 2004. PMID: 14660693
Cited by
-
Shadow enhancers mediate trade-offs between transcriptional noise and fidelity.PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 May 19;19(5):e1011071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011071. eCollection 2023 May. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023. PMID: 37205714 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancer architecture and chromatin accessibility constrain phenotypic space during Drosophila development.Dev Cell. 2023 Jan 9;58(1):51-62.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.12.003. Dev Cell. 2023. PMID: 36626871 Free PMC article.
-
Base-resolution models of transcription-factor binding reveal soft motif syntax.Nat Genet. 2021 Mar;53(3):354-366. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00782-6. Epub 2021 Feb 18. Nat Genet. 2021. PMID: 33603233 Free PMC article.
-
Cooperative assembly confers regulatory specificity and long-term genetic circuit stability.Cell. 2023 Aug 31;186(18):3810-3825.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.012. Epub 2023 Aug 7. Cell. 2023. PMID: 37552983 Free PMC article.
-
Robustness and innovation in synthetic genotype networks.Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 28;14(1):2454. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38033-3. Nat Commun. 2023. PMID: 37117168 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
