Impact of the Commercialization of Three Generic Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Adverse Events in Quebec, Canada: A Population-Based Time Series Analysis
- PMID: 28974512
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003891
Impact of the Commercialization of Three Generic Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Adverse Events in Quebec, Canada: A Population-Based Time Series Analysis
Abstract
Background: Once the patent of a brand-name drug expires, generic drugs are commercialized, and substitution from brand-name to generics may occur. Generic drug equivalence is evaluated through comparative bioavailability studies. Few studies have assessed outcomes after generic drug commercialization at a population level. We evaluated the impact of 3 generic angiotensin II receptor blockers commercialization on adverse events: hospitalizations or emergency room consultations.
Methods and results: This is an interrupted time series analysis using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System. Rates of adverse events for losartan, valsartan, and candesartan users (N=136 177) aged ≥66 years were calculated monthly, 24 months before and 12 months after generics commercialization. Periods before and after generics commercialization were compared by negative binomial segmented regression models. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted. For all users, there was a monthly mean rate of 100 adverse events for 1000 angiotensin II receptor blocker users before and after generic commercialization. Among generic users of losartan, valsartan, and candesartan, there was an increase in rates of adverse events of 8.0% (difference of proportions versus brand-name, 7.5% [95% confidence interval, -0.9% to 15.9%]; P=0.0643), 11.7% (difference of proportions, 17.1% [95% confidence interval, 9.9%-24.3%]; P<0.0001), and 14.0% (difference of proportions, 16.6% [95% confidence interval, 7.9%-25.3%]; P<0.0001), respectively, the month of generic commercialization. The monthly trend of adverse events was affected for generic versus brand-name losartan users only (difference of proportions, 2.0% [0.7%-3.4%]; P=0.0033) ≤1 year after generics commercialization. Similar results were found in sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: Among generic users, immediate or delayed differences in adverse events rates were observed right after generic commercialization for 3 antihypertensive drugs. Rates of adverse events remained higher for generic users. Increases were more pronounced for generic candesartan, which is the studied product with the largest difference in comparative bioavailability. Risk and survival analysis studies controlling for several potential confounding factors are required to better characterize generic substitution.
Keywords: adverse events complications; angiotensin II receptor blockers; brand-name drugs; generic drugs; pharmacoepidemiology.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.
Comment in
-
When Do We Decide That Generic and Brand-Name Drugs Are Clinically Equivalent? Perfecting Decisions With Imperfect Evidence.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Oct;10(10):e004158. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004158. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 28974513 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Did Generic Clopidogrel Commercialization Affect Trends of ER Consultations and Hospitalizations in the Population Treated with Clopidogrel?Drugs Aging. 2019 Aug;36(8):759-768. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00679-4. Drugs Aging. 2019. PMID: 31073846
-
Public Health Outcomes May Differ After Switching from Brand-Name to Generic Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers.Drugs R D. 2020 Jun;20(2):135-145. doi: 10.1007/s40268-020-00307-2. Drugs R D. 2020. PMID: 32342284 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Hospital Visits for Generic and Brand-Name Warfarin Users in Québec, Canada: A Population-Based Time Series Analysis.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019 Jun;19(3):287-297. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0309-9. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019. PMID: 30471054
-
Comparative clinical- and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis.Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Mar;65(3):253-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02633.x. Epub 2011 Feb 1. Int J Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 21284790 Review.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of candesartan and losartan in the management of essential hypertension.J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2011 Sep;12(3):365-74. doi: 10.1177/1470320310391503. Epub 2011 Mar 18. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2011. PMID: 21421652 Review.
Cited by
-
Generic substitution of amlodipine is not associated with increased risk of mortality or adverse cardiovascular events: An observational cohort study.Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr;17(4):e13779. doi: 10.1111/cts.13779. Clin Transl Sci. 2024. PMID: 38545866 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of the national volume-based procurement policy on the use of policy-related drugs in Nanjing: an interrupted time-series analysis.Int J Equity Health. 2023 Sep 28;22(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02006-1. Int J Equity Health. 2023. PMID: 37770924 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of generic medicines and medication adherence after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective multicentre cohort study.BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e061689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061689. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36127123 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in brand versus generic esmolol in the treatment of perioperative supraventricular tachycardia and hypertension: A pilot study.SAGE Open Med. 2020 Sep 30;8:2050312120962338. doi: 10.1177/2050312120962338. eCollection 2020. SAGE Open Med. 2020. PMID: 33062276 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety outcomes of one generic nifedipine versus ADALAT long-acting nifedipine for hypertension management.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Dec;22(12):2296-2305. doi: 10.1111/jch.14070. Epub 2020 Oct 9. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020. PMID: 33035392 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
