Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;47(2):245-259.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0941-7. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

The impact on rural livelihoods and ecosystem services of a major relocation and settlement program: A case in Shaanxi, China

Affiliations

The impact on rural livelihoods and ecosystem services of a major relocation and settlement program: A case in Shaanxi, China

Cong Li et al. Ambio. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

China's largest-ever resettlement program is underway, aiming to restore ecosystems and lift ecosystem service providers out of the poverty trap and into sustainable livelihoods. We examine the impact of the relocation and settlement program (RSP) to date, reporting on an ecosystem services (ES) assessment and a 1400-household survey. The RSP generally achieves the goals of ES increase and livelihood restore. In biophysical terms, the RSP improves water quality, sediment retention, and carbon sequestration. In social terms, resettled households so far report transformation of livelihoods activities from traditional inefficient agricultural and forest production to non-farm activities. Increased income contributes to decrease the poverty rate and improve resettled households' living condition and standard. Meanwhile, the RSP decreases households' dependence on ES in terms of provisioning services. Difficulty and challenge also showed up subsequently after relocation. A major current challenge is to enable poorer households to move, while providing greater follow-up support to relocated households. While the program is unique to China, it illuminates widespread opportunities for addressing environmental and poverty-related concerns in a rapidly changing world.

Keywords: Ankang prefecture; Ecosystem services; Human development; Relocation and settlement; Rural household; Sustainable livelihoods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ankang Prefecture (23 534 km2) in Shaanxi Province. The blue line between Ankang and Beijing in the China map is the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project (SNWTP)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scenes of the areas surveyed: a Road damaged by landslide; b, c Surveying rural household members in the original community. d New homes, with power lines and light poles in the background
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A livelihoods framework for assessing the impact of the Relocation and Settlement Program of Southern Shaanxi Province (RSP). Livelihood assets include five capital stocks, physical (P), human (H), financial (F), social (S), and natural (N)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Projected relative changes in ecosystem services over implementation of the Relocation and Settlement Program (RSP) over 2011–2020
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Basic information about the investigated householders
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Radar maps of asset indicators in the three surveyed household groups, used to assess the effects of the Relocation and Settlement Program on livelihoods: Households relocating from the deep mountains (HHr,sc, relocation, settling community); HHs choosing to remain in communities from which people are moving (HHn,oc, non-relocation, original community); and original HHs in the communities where people are settling (HHn,sc, non-relocation, settling community). HHs remaining in communities from which people are moving are the poorest, and least able to move, by both a exogenous indicators and b endogenous indicators

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bebbington AJ. Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development. 1999;27:2021–2044. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7. - DOI
    1. Cernea M. Risks, safeguards and reconstruction. In: Cernea M, McDowell C, editors. Risks and reconstruction: Experiences of resettlers and refugees. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank; 2000. pp. 1–55.
    1. Cernea MM. Risks, safeguards and reconstruction: A model for population displacement and resettlement. Economic and Political Weekly. 2000;35:3659–3678.
    1. Cernea, M.M., and K. Schmidt-Soltau. 2003. Biodiversity conservation versus population resettlement: Risks to nature and risks to people. In International CIFOR-Conference on ‘‘Rural Livelihoods, Forests and Biodiversity’’, Bonn, Germany 19–23 May, 2003.
    1. Daily GC. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 1997.

LinkOut - more resources