Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May;42(5):1469-1476.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4298-7.

Esophagectomy for End-Stage Achalasia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Esophagectomy for End-Stage Achalasia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Alberto Aiolfi et al. World J Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Indications for surgery and clinical outcomes of esophagectomy in the management of end-stage achalasia are not clearly defined. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide evidence-based information to help in the decision-making and in the choice of surgical technique.

Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted to identify all reports on esophagectomy for end-stage achalasia patients over the past three decades. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were thoroughly consulted matching the terms "achalasia," "end-stage achalasia," "esophagectomy" and "esophageal resection" with "AND" and "OR." Short- and long-term outcome data were extracted. Pooled prevalence of pneumonia, anastomotic leakage and mortality were calculated using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation and DerSimonian-Laird estimator in random effect meta-analysis. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using I 2-index and Cochrane Q test. Meta-regression was used to address the effect of potential confounders.

Results: Eight papers published between 1989 and 2014 matched the inclusion criteria. In total, 1307 patients were included. Esophagectomy was performed through a transthoracic (78.7%) or a transhiatal (21.3%) approach. The stomach was used as an esophageal substitute in 95% of patients. Pooled prevalence of pneumonia, anastomotic leakage and mortality were 10% (95% CI 4-18%), 7% (95% CI 4-10%) and 2% (95% CI 1-3%), respectively.

Conclusions: Esophagectomy for end-stage achalasia is safe and effective. Based on the results of this study, esophagectomy should be performed without hesitation in patients who are fit for major surgery and present with disabling symptoms, poor quality of life and dolichomegaesophagus recalcitrant to multiple endoscopic dilatations and/or surgical myotomies.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 articles

  • 2019 Seoul Consensus on Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines.
    Jung HK, Hong SJ, Lee OY, Pandolfino J, Park H, Miwa H, Ghoshal UC, Mahadeva S, Oshima T, Chen M, Chua ASB, Cho YK, Lee TH, Min YW, Park CH, Kwon JG, Park MI, Jung K, Park JK, Jung KW, Lim HC, Jung DH, Kim DH, Lim CH, Moon HS, Park JH, Choi SC, Suzuki H, Patcharatrakul T, Wu JCY, Lee KJ, Tanaka S, Siah KTH, Park KS, Kim SE; Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. Jung HK, et al. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Apr 30;26(2):180-203. doi: 10.5056/jnm20014. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020. PMID: 32235027 Free PMC article. Review.
  • European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations.
    Oude Nijhuis RAB, Zaninotto G, Roman S, Boeckxstaens GE, Fockens P, Langendam MW, Plumb AA, Smout A, Targarona EM, Trukhmanov AS, Weusten B, Bredenoord AJ. Oude Nijhuis RAB, et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Feb;8(1):13-33. doi: 10.1177/2050640620903213. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020. PMID: 32213062 Free PMC article.

References

    1. World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec 8;14 (1):304 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Feb;18(2):310-7 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001 Apr;11(2):235-48, v - PubMed
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Sep;72(3):854-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1995 Jun;130(6):632-6; discussion 636-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback