Standard Versus Simplified Consent Materials for Biobank Participation: Differences in Patient Knowledge and Trial Accrual

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Dec;12(5):326-334. doi: 10.1177/1556264617731869. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

Abstract

Replacing standard consent materials with simplified materials is a promising intervention to improve patient comprehension, but there is little evidence on its real-world implementation. We employed a sequential two-arm design to compare the effect of standard versus simplified consent materials on potential donors' understanding of biobank processes and their accrual to an active biobanking program. Participants were female patients of a California breast health clinic. Subjects from the simplified arm answered more items correctly ( p = .064), reported "don't know" for fewer items ( p = .077), and consented to donate to the biobank at higher rates ( p = .025) than those from the standard arm. Replacing an extant consent form with a simplified version is feasible and may benefit patient comprehension and study accrual.

Keywords: Common Rule; accrual; biobanks; biorepositories; enhanced consent form; informed consent; patient comprehension; tissue donors.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biological Specimen Banks*
  • Biomedical Research*
  • California
  • Comprehension*
  • Consent Forms / standards*
  • Female
  • Health Facilities
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent*
  • Knowledge
  • Middle Aged
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*
  • Tissue Donors*