Indirect effects drive coevolution in mutualistic networks
- PMID: 29045396
- DOI: 10.1038/nature24273
Indirect effects drive coevolution in mutualistic networks
Abstract
Ecological interactions have been acknowledged to play a key role in shaping biodiversity. Yet a major challenge for evolutionary biology is to understand the role of ecological interactions in shaping trait evolution when progressing from pairs of interacting species to multispecies interaction networks. Here we introduce an approach that integrates coevolutionary dynamics and network structure. Our results show that non-interacting species can be as important as directly interacting species in shaping coevolution within mutualistic assemblages. The contribution of indirect effects differs among types of mutualism. Indirect effects are more likely to predominate in nested, species-rich networks formed by multiple-partner mutualisms, such as pollination or seed dispersal by animals, than in small and modular networks formed by intimate mutualisms, such as those between host plants and their protective ants. Coevolutionary pathways of indirect effects favour ongoing trait evolution by promoting slow but continuous reorganization of the adaptive landscape of mutualistic partners under changing environments. Our results show that coevolution can be a major process shaping species traits throughout ecological networks. These findings expand our understanding of how evolution driven by interactions occurs through the interplay of selection pressures moving along multiple direct and indirect pathways.
Similar articles
-
The geographic mosaic of coevolution in mutualistic networks.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 20;115(47):12017-12022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809088115. Epub 2018 Nov 7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. PMID: 30404910 Free PMC article.
-
Interaction intimacy affects structure and coevolutionary dynamics in mutualistic networks.Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 23;17(20):1797-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.059. Curr Biol. 2007. PMID: 17949981
-
Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks.Ecol Lett. 2011 Sep;14(9):877-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01649.x. Epub 2011 Jul 12. Ecol Lett. 2011. PMID: 21749596
-
Diversification and coevolution in brood pollination mutualisms: Windows into the role of biotic interactions in generating biological diversity.Am J Bot. 2016 Oct;103(10):1783-1792. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600056. Epub 2016 Oct 7. Am J Bot. 2016. PMID: 27765775 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Seeing through the static: the temporal dimension of plant-animal mutualistic interactions.Ecol Lett. 2021 Jan;24(1):149-161. doi: 10.1111/ele.13623. Epub 2020 Oct 19. Ecol Lett. 2021. PMID: 33073900 Review.
Cited by
-
A community perspective on the concept of marine holobionts: current status, challenges, and future directions.PeerJ. 2021 Feb 25;9:e10911. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10911. eCollection 2021. PeerJ. 2021. PMID: 33665032 Free PMC article.
-
The extent, frequency and ecological functions of food wasting by parrots.Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 24;9(1):15280. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51430-3. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31649288 Free PMC article.
-
The geographic mosaic of coevolution in mutualistic networks.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 20;115(47):12017-12022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809088115. Epub 2018 Nov 7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. PMID: 30404910 Free PMC article.
-
Plant evolution can mediate negative effects from honey bees on wild pollinators.Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr 12;10(10):4407-4418. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6207. eCollection 2020 May. Ecol Evol. 2020. PMID: 32489606 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for hunter-gatherer impacts on raven diet and ecology in the Gravettian of Southern Moravia.Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Aug;7(8):1302-1314. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02107-8. Epub 2023 Jun 22. Nat Ecol Evol. 2023. PMID: 37349568
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
