Upright versus lying down position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with low dose epidural: BUMPES randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 29046273
- PMCID: PMC5646262
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4471
Upright versus lying down position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with low dose epidural: BUMPES randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective To determine whether being upright in the second stage of labour in nulliparous women with a low dose epidural increases the chance of spontaneous vaginal birth compared with lying down.Design Multicentre pragmatic individually randomised controlled trial.Setting 41 UK hospital labour wards.Participants 3093 nulliparous women aged 16 or older, at term with a singleton cephalic presentation and in the second stage of labour with epidural analgesia.Interventions Women were allocated to an upright or lying down position, using a secure web based randomisation service, stratified by centre, with no masking of participants or clinicians to the trial interventions.Main outcome measures The primary outcome was spontaneous vaginal birth. Women were analysed in the groups into which they were randomly allocated, regardless of position recorded at any time during the second stage of labour (excluding women with no valid consent, who withdrew, or who did not reach second stage before delivery). Secondary outcomes included mode of birth, perineal trauma, infant Apgar score <4 at five minutes, admission to a neonatal unit, and longer term included maternal physical and psychological health, incontinence, and infant gross developmental delay. Results Between 4 October 2010 and 31 January 2014, 3236 women were randomised and 3093 (95.6%) included in the primary analysis (1556 in the upright group and 1537 in the lying down group). Significantly fewer spontaneous vaginal births occurred in women in the upright group: 35.2% (548/1556) compared with 41.1% (632/1537) in the lying down group (adjusted risk ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.94). This represents a 5.9% absolute increase in the chance of spontaneous vaginal birth in the lying down group (number needed to treat 17, 95% confidence interval 11 to 40). No evidence of differences was found for most of the secondary maternal, neonatal, or longer term outcomes including instrumental vaginal delivery (adjusted risk ratio 1.08, 99% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.18), obstetric anal sphincter injury (1.27, 0.88 to 1.84), infant Apgar score <4 at five minutes (0.66, 0.06 to 6.88), and maternal faecal incontinence at one year (1.18, 0.61 to 2.28).Conclusions Evidence shows that lying down in the second stage of labour results in more spontaneous vaginal births in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia, with no apparent disadvantages in relation to short or longer term outcomes for mother or baby.Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN35706297.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the NIHR HTA programme for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A multicentre, randomised controlled trial of position during the late stages of labour in nulliparous women with an epidural: clinical effectiveness and an economic evaluation (BUMPES).Health Technol Assess. 2017 Nov;21(65):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta21650. Health Technol Assess. 2017. PMID: 29110753 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 9;11(11):CD008070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30411804 Free PMC article.
-
Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 24;2(2):CD008070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 09;11:CD008070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub4 PMID: 28231607 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 9;(10):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 26;3:CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub3 PMID: 26451755 Updated. Review.
-
Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD008070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 24;2:CD008070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub3 PMID: 23440824 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring implementation of intrapartum trial evidence: a qualitative study with clinicians and clinical academics.Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Sep 27;5(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00647-z. Implement Sci Commun. 2024. PMID: 39334313 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and neonatal trauma during forceps and vacuum delivery must not be overlooked.BMJ. 2023 Oct 19;383:e073991. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073991. BMJ. 2023. PMID: 37857419 Free PMC article.
-
Inviting Newton to Visit the Delivery Room. The Role of Gravity During Childbirth.Int J Womens Health. 2023 Jul 14;15:1059-1061. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S405077. eCollection 2023. Int J Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37465720 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of Laboring People's Mobility and Positional Changes on Birth Outcomes in Low-Dose Epidural Analgesia Labor: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Jan;68(1):84-98. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13446. Epub 2022 Dec 12. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36504479 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence of Perineal Tear Peripartum after Two Antepartum Perineal Massage Techniques: A Non-Randomised Controlled Trial.J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 25;10(21):4934. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214934. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34768453 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Khor LJ, Jeskins G, Cooper GM, Paterson-Brown S. National obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK 1997/1998. Anaesthesia 2000;55:1168-72. 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01720.x pmid:11121925. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Redshaw M, Henderson J. Safely delivered: a national survey of women’s experience of maternity care. 2014. https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/reports/807-safely-delivered
-
- Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RMD, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(12):CD000331 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3. pmid:22161362. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:19-23. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05251-X pmid:11454372. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Liu EH, Sia AT. Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review. BMJ 2004;328:1410 10.1136/bmj.38097.590810.7C pmid:15169744. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical