The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: A Study to Evaluate Compliance With Inclusion and Assessment of Women and Minorities in Randomized Controlled Trials
- PMID: 29053489
- PMCID: PMC5908758
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002027
The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: A Study to Evaluate Compliance With Inclusion and Assessment of Women and Minorities in Randomized Controlled Trials
Abstract
Purpose: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act of 1993 requires NIH-funded clinical trials to include women and minorities as participants and assess outcomes by sex and race or ethnicity. The objective of this study was to investigate current levels of compliance with these guidelines for inclusion, analysis, and reporting in NIH-funded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and compare the results with those from 2009 and 2004, which the authors reported previously.
Method: The authors identified 782 RCTs published in 14 leading U.S. medical journals in 2015 with a PubMed search. Of those, 142 were the primary report of an NIH-funded RCT, conducted in the United States, and eligible for analysis. The authors reviewed abstract, text, and tables of each eligible study as well as any follow-up published commentary to determine compliance with NIH guidelines.
Results: Thirty-five studies limited enrollment to one sex. The median enrollment of women in the remaining 107 studies was 46%, but 16 (15.0%) enrolled less than 30% women. Twenty-eight of the 107 (26%) reported at least one outcome by sex or explicitly included sex as a covariate in statistical analysis. Of the 142 studies, 19 (13.4%) analyzed or reported outcomes by race or ethnicity. There were no statistically significant changes in inclusion, analysis, or reporting by sex, race, or ethnicity compared with the previous studies.
Conclusions: NIH policies have not resulted in significant increases in reporting results by sex, race, or ethnicity. The authors recommend strong journal policies to increase compliance with NIH policies.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials: have we made progress?J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Mar;20(3):315-20. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2469. Epub 2011 Feb 25. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011. PMID: 21351877 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to federal guidelines for reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Dec;15(10):1123-31. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.1123. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006. PMID: 17199453 Review.
-
Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials.Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1091-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28575. Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24643646 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Minority Representation in Migraine Treatment Trials.Headache. 2017 Mar;57(3):525-533. doi: 10.1111/head.13018. Epub 2017 Jan 27. Headache. 2017. PMID: 28127754 Review.
-
The inclusion of minority groups in clinical trials: problems of under representation and under reporting of data.Account Res. 2004 Jul-Dec;11(3-4):215-23. doi: 10.1080/08989620490891412. Account Res. 2004. PMID: 15812967
Cited by 22 articles
-
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint blockade in self-identified Black patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer. 2020 Dec 1;126(23):5040-5049. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33141. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32902858
-
Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine.Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):565-582. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31561-0. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32828189 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of Sex or Race With the Effect of Weight Loss on Physical Function: A Secondary Analysis of 8 Randomized Clinical Trials.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2014631. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14631. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32821924 Free PMC article.
-
Digitizing clinical trials.NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jul 31;3:101. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0302-y. eCollection 2020. NPJ Digit Med. 2020. PMID: 32821856 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 13;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00509-y. BMC Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32791969 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
