Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1)
- PMID: 29053726
- PMCID: PMC5650145
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186043
Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1)
Abstract
Background: Identification of families at risk for ovarian cancer offers the opportunity to consider prophylactic surgery thus reducing ovarian cancer mortality. So far, identification of potentially affected families in Germany was solely performed via family history and numbers of affected family members with breast or ovarian cancer. However, neither the prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 in ovarian cancer in Germany nor the reliability of family history as trigger for genetic counselling has ever been evaluated.
Methods: Prospective counseling and germline testing of consecutive patients with primary diagnosis or with platinum-sensitive relapse of an invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Testing included 25 candidate and established risk genes. Among these 25 genes, 16 genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, PMS2, PTEN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53) were defined as established cancer risk genes. A positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or breast cancer in personal history.
Results: In total, we analyzed 523 patients: 281 patients with primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 242 patients with relapsed disease. Median age at primary diagnosis was 58 years (range 16-93) and 406 patients (77.6%) had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In total, 27.9% of the patients showed at least one deleterious variant in all 25 investigated genes and 26.4% in the defined 16 risk genes. Deleterious variants were most prevalent in the BRCA1 (15.5%), BRCA2 (5.5%), RAD51C (2.5%) and PALB2 (1.1%) genes. The prevalence of deleterious variants did not differ significantly between patients at primary diagnosis and relapse. The prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 (and in all 16 risk genes) in patients <60 years was 30.2% (33.2%) versus 10.6% (18.9%) in patients ≥60 years. Family history was positive in 43% of all patients. Patients with a positive family history had a prevalence of deleterious variants of 31.6% (36.0%) versus 11.4% (17.6%) and histologic subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer versus other showed a prevalence of deleterious variants of 23.2% (29.1%) and 10.2% (14.8%), respectively. Testing only for BRCA1/2 would miss in our series more than 5% of the patients with a deleterious variant in established risk genes.
Conclusions: 26.4% of all patients harbor at least one deleterious variant in established risk genes. The threshold of 10% mutation rate which is accepted for reimbursement by health care providers in Germany was observed in all subgroups analyzed and neither age at primary diagnosis nor histo-type or family history sufficiently enough could identify a subgroup not eligible for genetic counselling and testing. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and limiting testing to BRCA1/2 seems to be not sufficient.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Deleterious somatic variants in 473 consecutive individuals with ovarian cancer: results of the observational AGO-TR1 study (NCT02222883).J Med Genet. 2019 Sep;56(9):574-580. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105930. Epub 2019 Apr 12. J Med Genet. 2019. PMID: 30979843
-
Targeted massively parallel sequencing of a panel of putative breast cancer susceptibility genes in a large cohort of multiple-case breast and ovarian cancer families.J Med Genet. 2016 Jan;53(1):34-42. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103452. Epub 2015 Nov 3. J Med Genet. 2016. PMID: 26534844 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1460-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0747. Epub 2016 Mar 14. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26976419 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendations for Preventive Care for Women with Rare Genetic Cause of Breast and Ovarian Cancer.Klin Onkol. 2019 Summer;32(Supplementum2):6-13. doi: 10.14735/amko2019S6. Klin Onkol. 2019. PMID: 31409076 Review. English.
-
Prevention and therapy for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer.Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000 Jun;9(3):139-50. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000. PMID: 10954253 Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of BRCA1 Expression on Survival Status in Ovarian Serous Carcinoma of Egyptian Patients.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Oct 1;24(10):3613-3620. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.10.3613. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023. PMID: 37898870 Free PMC article.
-
[Ovarian cancer: molecular pathology and molecularly targeted therapy].Pathologie (Heidelb). 2023 Sep;44(5):320-328. doi: 10.1007/s00292-023-01214-4. Epub 2023 Aug 16. Pathologie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 37584749 German.
-
Clinical Impact of Polygenic Risk Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in 382 Individuals with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;15(15):3938. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153938. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37568754 Free PMC article.
-
Which Patients Do We Need to Test for BRCA1/2 Mutation? Feasibility of Adjuvant Olaparib Treatment in Early Breast Cancer-Real-World Data from Two Large German Breast Centers.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 28;15(15):3847. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153847. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37568663 Free PMC article.
-
Combined Tumor-Based BRCA1/2 and TP53 Mutation Testing in Ovarian Cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 18;24(14):11570. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411570. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37511329 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sant M, Chirlaque Lopez MD, Agresti R, Sanchéz Pérez M, Holleczeck B, Bielska Lasota M, et al. Survival of women with cancers of breast and genital organs in Europe 1999–2007: results of the EUROCARE-5 study. Eur J Cancer. 2015. September 6. - PubMed
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016. July; 66(4):271–89 - PubMed
-
- du Bois A, Lück HJ, Meier W, Adams HP, Möbus V, Costa S, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003. September 3; 95(17):1320–9. - PubMed
-
- Heitz F, Harter P, Barinoff J, Beutel B, Kannisto P, Grabowski JP, et al. Bevacizumab in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Adv Ther. 2012. September;29(9):723–35 doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0041-9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hanker LC, Loibl S, Burchardi N, Pfisterer J, Meier W, Pujade-Lauraine E, et al. The impact of second to sixth line therapy on survival of relapsed ovarian cancer after primary taxane/platinum-based therapy. Ann Oncol. 2012. October;23(10):2065–12. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
