Are cost differences between specialist and general hospitals compensated by the prospective payment system?

Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Feb;20(1):7-26. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0935-1. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

Abstract

Prospective payment systems fund hospitals based on a fixed-price regime that does not directly distinguish between specialist and general hospitals. We investigate whether current prospective payments in England compensate for differences in costs between specialist orthopaedic hospitals and trauma and orthopaedics departments in general hospitals. We employ reference cost data for a sample of hospitals providing services in the trauma and orthopaedics specialty. Our regression results suggest that specialist orthopaedic hospitals have on average 13% lower profit margins. Under the assumption of break-even for the average trauma and orthopaedics department, two of the three specialist orthopaedic hospitals appear to make a loss on their activity. The same holds true for 33% of departments in our sample. Patient age and severity are the main drivers of such differences.

Keywords: HRG; Hospital costs; Orthopaedics; Reference costs; Specialist hospitals; Tariff.

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Costs and Cost Analysis / economics
  • Costs and Cost Analysis / statistics & numerical data
  • Economics, Hospital
  • Female
  • Hospitals, General / economics*
  • Hospitals, General / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitals, Special / economics*
  • Hospitals, Special / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Econometric
  • Prospective Payment System / economics*
  • Prospective Payment System / organization & administration
  • Prospective Payment System / statistics & numerical data
  • United Kingdom